IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J.
Harsh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi and Others - Respondents
Crl. M.C. 5295 of 2022
Decided on : 13-04-2023
Quashing of FIR - Settlement Deed - The court quashed the FIR and all proceedings based on a settlement deed reached between the parties, where they agreed to resolve their disputes and end the criminal prosecution.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was involved in a road accident resulting in serious injuries to the respondent. A settlement deed was reached between the parties, and a sum of Rs. 35,000/- each was paid to the respondents.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had settled the matter amicably without fear, force, or coercion. It considered the special facts of the case and quashed the proceedings based on the settlement deed.
Issues: The issue was whether the court should quash the criminal proceedings based on the settlement reached between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court may quash criminal proceedings when the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing the prosecution to continue, considering the special facts of the case.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR No. 370/2022 under Section 279/338 IPC and Section 3/181 of MV Act registered at P.S. Moti Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom based on the settlement deed. The petition was disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 370/2022 under Section 279/338 IPC and Section 3/181 of MV Act registered at P.S. Moti Nagar.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the present FIR was lodged by respondent no. 2 Ankit Dogra alleging therein that on 23.04.2022 at about 1 : 30am Respondent no. 2 was going to drop Respondent No. 3 in his vehicle bearing no. DL8CAS2816 when his vehicle was hit by the offending vehicle bearing no. DL8CAK5849 which was driven by the petitioner. On account of this respondent no. 3 suffered serious injuries.
3. After the investigation, the charge-sheet was filed. However, now it is submitted that the parties have reached into a settlement vide settlement deed 20.09.2022. The settlement deed has been placed on record.
4. The terms of the settlement deed are as follows:—
AND WHEREAS as efforts made for settlement, the first party will pay a sum of Rs. 35,000/- to Third Party and Rs. 35,000/- to the Second Party for getting the quashing of chargesheet against FIR No. 0370/2022 P.S. Moti Nagar, West Delhi under Section 279/338, Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3/181 of MV Act and the consequential proceedings arising.
AND WHEREAS this FIR quashing Settlement Deed has been executed between the parties with their mutual consent and free will without any pressure, force, coercion or undue influence from any side. The parties have decided to end all their disputes fully and to live peacefully.
The complaint filed by the Second Party against First party shall stand withdrawn, cancelled and revoked finally after signing of this mutual Settlement Deed.
The Second and Third Party have no objection, if the Honble Court quash the chargesheet against FIR No. 0370/2022 P.S. Moti Nagar, West Delhi under Section 279/338 Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3/181 of MV Act and the consequential proceedings arising thereupon on the basis of this settlement deed.”
5. In terms of the settlement a sum of Rs. 35,000/- each has been paid to the respondents.
6. Both the respondents have appeared through VC and they have settled the matter amicably without any fear, force or coercion.
7. It has been repeatedly held that when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and, therefore, no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a criminal prosecution to continue, the court may while taking into consideration the special facts of a case quash the proceedings.
8. In terms of the above facts and circumstances the case FIR No. 370/2022 under Section 279/338 IPC and Section 3/181 of MV Act registered at P.S. Moti Nagar and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom is quashed.
9. The present petition is disposed of.
The court may quash criminal proceedings based on a settlement reached between the parties when the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing t....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's power under Section 482 of the Code to quash proceedings, which must be exercised with caution and circumspection, taking into consi....
The voluntary nature of settlements and lack of remaining grievance from the complainants can lead to the quashing of FIR and related proceedings.
The court can quash FIRs in non-compoundable offenses based on a valid settlement between parties, highlighting that continuation serves no useful purpose.
Courts have a duty to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and may quash proceedings based on settlements using inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a settlement between the parties, as provided under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and established through case law.
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings if the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, and continuation of the case would be an abuse ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.