Harsh Yadav vs State NCT of Delhi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 2136

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 2136

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Harsh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocate.
Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with Mr. Dipanshu Meena, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.

The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 370/2022 under Section 279/338 IPC and Section 3/181 of MV Act registered at P.S. Moti Nagar.

2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the present FIR was lodged by respondent no. 2 Ankit Dogra alleging therein that on 23.04.2022 at about 1 : 30am Respondent no. 2 was going to drop Respondent No. 3 in his vehicle bearing no. DL8CAS2816 when his vehicle was hit by the offending vehicle bearing no. DL8CAK5849 which was driven by the petitioner. On account of this respondent no. 3 suffered serious injuries.

3. After the investigation, the charge-sheet was filed. However, now it is submitted that the parties have reached into a settlement vide settlement deed 20.09.2022. The settlement deed has been placed on record.

4. The terms of the settlement deed are as follows:—

“AND WHEREAS as efforts and attempts were made by the friends and elders as well as the respectable people of the society thereby clarifying all the bonafide mistakes, misunderstandings between the parties. That all the parties have settled their dispute and the parties shall make statements before the Hon'ble Court in this respe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document