IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATEEK JALAN, J.
Smt Maniba Mahila Bed College & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
National Council For Teacher Education & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 5788 of 2021
Decided on : 03-06-2021
NCTE Regulations - Recognition of Teacher Education Institution - 2014 Regulations - [B.Ed. Course, Recognition Order, Affidavit, Intake] - The court discussed the NCTE Regulations, 2014 and the process for recognition of teacher education institutions. It highlighted the option given to existing institutions to choose between one or two basic units and the requirement for submitting an affidavit in the prescribed format. The court emphasized the importance of clear and unequivocal communication of the institution's choice and rejected the petitioner's claim of a typographical error.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a teacher training institute, sought a revised recognition order for a second basic unit [50 seats] of its B.Ed. course. The institute had initially been granted recognition for an intake of 100 seats and was required to submit compliance affidavits following the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014. The institute communicated its choice for one basic unit of 50 students, but later sought recognition for the second unit.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the institute's communication clearly and unambiguously indicated its choice for one basic unit of 50 students. It rejected the institute's claim of a typographical error and emphasized the importance of clear and unequivocal communication. The court dismissed the petition and imposed costs on the petitioner.
Issues: The key issue was whether the institute's communication regarding the choice of basic units was clear and unambiguous, or if it was a result of a typographical error.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the institute's communication clearly indicated its choice for one basic unit of 50 students, and rejected the claim of a typographical error. It emphasized the importance of clear and unequivocal communication in such matters.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and costs of Rs. 30,000/- were imposed on the petitioner.
JUDGMENT :
PRATEEK JALAN, J.
The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 18145/2021 & CM APPL. 18147/2021 (Exemption)
Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The applications stand disposed of.
W.P.(C) 5788/2021 with CM APPL. 18146/2021 (for direction)
1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner assails an order dated 26.09.2019 passed by the Appellate Committee of the National Council for Teacher Education [“NCTE”]. The petitioner also seeks a direction upon the NCTE to issue a revised recognition order for a second basic unit [50 seats] of its B.Ed. course.
2. The petitioner, a teacher training institute, was originally granted recognition by the Western Regional Committee [“WRC”] of the NCTE on 23.04.2005, for an intake of 100 seats. After the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014 [“2014 Regulations”] came into force, the petitioner and all other existing institutions were required to submit compliance affidavits, following which the NCTE issued revised recognition orders to them.
3. On 24.12.2014, the NCTE issued guidelines to its Regional Committees for processing of pending applications and for existing institutions, alongwith an Explanatory Note. This document has been relied upon in the writ petition, and a copy has been annexed thereto as Annexure P-6. The following provisions of the Explanatory Note are relevant, insofar as the B.Ed. programme of existing institutions is concerned:
The existing teacher education institutions, wherever necessary as per the revised Norms and Standards, shall provide additional built up area, create additional infrastructure, appoint additional staff and furnish additional Reserve Fund per unit per programme by October 31, 2015. However, if the institution is not willing to fulfil the norms prescribed in the New Regulations as mentioned above, its Recognition will automatically become invalid as the old Regulations have already been superceded.
xxxx xxxx xxxx
3. In the new Regulations, the size of one basic unit for B.Ed. has been reduced to 50 from 100. The institutions are eligible to have two basic units of 50 each initially. In order to have two basic units of 50 each, they need to construct additional built up area, appoint additional staff, furnish additional Endowment and Reserve Fund.
The institution shall opt for one or two basic units in the undertaking enclosed with the covering letter. Based on the undertaking. revised recognition order will be issued accordingly. In case the institution opts for two basic units of 50 each, they will be permitted to admit students for two basic units from 2015-2016 onwards, but they shall construct additional built up area. create additional infrastructure and pay additional Endowment and Reserve Fund by October 31, 2015. If they fail to adhere to this condition, the recognition for additional unit will be withdrawn from 2016-17 onwards.
In case the institution does not opt for two basic units and choose to have only one basic unit, they shall admit only 50 students from the academic year 2015-16 onwards.” (Emphasis supplied.)
4. Pursuant to the aforesaid requirements, the petitioners addressed a communication dated 12.01.2015 to the WRC enclosing therewith an affidavit of the same date. The said communication reads as follows:-
Subject: For optimization of one basic unit of 50 students for B.Ed. Programme Code No:
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of clear and unambiguous communication in the process of seeking recognition under the NCTE Regulations, 2014.
An institution's clear and unequivocal option under recognition regulations prevents subsequent claims of error in basic unit selection.
An institution must comply with the NCTE's built-up area requirements to maintain recognition, and inspection is not obligatory if documentation clearly shows non-compliance.
Compliance with the minimum built-up area requirements is essential for the recognition of teacher education institutions.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that any request for restoration or enhancement of intake capacity for educational programs must strictly adhere to the prescribed procedure under ....
The appellate authority must consider the documents submitted by the petitioner and make acceptable findings before making a decision on the withdrawal of recognition.
Recognition of educational institutions cannot be withdrawn without considering subsequent compliance with regulations, ensuring procedural fairness in the evaluation process.
The need for commensurate faculty strength as per the NCTE Act and the requirement for proper authorization for admitting students.
Recognition to Teachers Training Colleges – There can be no rational for NCTE or its Regional Committee to deny recognition from Academic Year 2021-2022 and insist on recognition for Academic Session....
Compliance with NCTE Regulations is essential for recognition; failure leads to withdrawal of recognition, as demonstrated in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.