Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Smt Maniba Mahila B.ed College – Appellant
Versus
National Council for Teacher Education – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's application for additional b.ed. seats. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner challenges ncte decision. (Para 8) |
| 3. court finds no need for intervention. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. petitioner's claim of typographical error rejected. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. court distinguishes related case law. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. petition dismissed with costs. (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)
The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 18145/2021 & CM APPL. 18147/2021 (Exemption)
Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The applications stand disposed of.
W.P.(C) 5788/2021 with CM APPL. 18146/2021 (for direction)
1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner assails an order dated 26.09.2019 passed by the Appellate Committee of the National Council for Teacher Education ["NCTE"]. The petitioner also seeks a direction upon the NCTE to issue a revised recognition order for a second basic unit [50 seats] of its B.Ed. course.
2. The petitioner, a teacher training institute, was originally granted recognition by the Western Regional Committee ["WRC"] of the NCTE on 23.04.
An institution's clear and unequivocal option under recognition regulations prevents subsequent claims of error in basic unit selection.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of clear and unambiguous communication in the process of seeking recognition under the NCTE Regulations, 2014.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that any request for restoration or enhancement of intake capacity for educational programs must strictly adhere to the prescribed procedure under ....
Compliance with the minimum built-up area requirements is essential for the recognition of teacher education institutions.
The appellate authority must consider the documents submitted by the petitioner and make acceptable findings before making a decision on the withdrawal of recognition.
Recognition of educational institutions cannot be withdrawn without considering subsequent compliance with regulations, ensuring procedural fairness in the evaluation process.
The need for commensurate faculty strength as per the NCTE Act and the requirement for proper authorization for admitting students.
Recognition to Teachers Training Colleges – There can be no rational for NCTE or its Regional Committee to deny recognition from Academic Year 2021-2022 and insist on recognition for Academic Session....
Compliance with NCTE Regulations is essential for recognition; failure leads to withdrawal of recognition, as demonstrated in this case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
