Suleman vs State (NCT Of Delhi) - 2022 Supreme(Del) 2194

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Del) 2194

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Suleman – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT Of Delhi) – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Nitin Bansal and Mr. Kundan Kumar, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, with ASI Rajveer

JUDGMENT :

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.

	INDEX
S.No.	Particulars	Pages
1.	Facts of the Case	2 - 4
2.	Submissions of Learned Counsels	4
3.	Default Bail Under Section 167	4 - 18
	(i) Objective	4 – 9
	(ii) Law	9 – 18
4.	FSL Report not part of the Charge Sheet	18 – 21
5.	Conclusion	21

1. The present Revision Petition has been filed, to set aside the order dated 05.05.2022, passed by the Learned Trial Court, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, wherein Default Bail of the Petitioner, under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the learned Trial Court.

Facts of the Case

2. The brief facts leading to the present petition are as under:

a) The Petitioner is in custody in case FIR no. 96/2021 under Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter “NDPS Act”) registered at P.S. Narela Industrial Area. On completion of the investigation, the charge sheet was filed on 03.03.2021 without the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report. The charge sheet already filed mentioned th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Del) 2194

SWARANA KANTA SHARMASuleman – AppellantVersusState (NCT Of Delhi) – Respondent

Cases Referred (11)

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Suleman – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT Of Delhi) – Respondent