SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Suleman – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts of the case establish the context for bail. (Para 1 , 2)
2. argument regarding fsl report's role in the charge sheet. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's reasoning on default bail and fsl report implications. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. conclusion affirming refusal of bail application. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.

INDEX
S. No.ParticularsPara
1.Facts of the Case2
2.Submissions of Learned Counsels3
3.Default Bail Under Section 1675
(i) Objective5
(ii) Law7
4.FSL Report not part of the Charge Sheet10
5.Conclusion14

1. The present Revision Petition has been filed, to set aside the order dated 05.05.2022, passed by the Learned Trial Court, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, wherein Default Bail of the Petitioner, under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the learned Trial Court.

Facts of the Case

2. The brief facts leading to the present petition are as under:

a) The Petitioner is in custody in case FIR no. 96/2021 under Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter "NDPS Act") registered at P.S. Narela Industrial Area. On completion of the investigation, the charge sheet was filed on 03.03.202

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top