SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2306

REKHA PALLI
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Pankaj Nagar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.N. Parashar, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Sameer Nandwani and Rohin Singh Pande, Advocates for R-3.

JUDGMENT

Rekha Palli, J. (Oral)

1. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeks to assail the award dated 20.01.2022 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in claim petition bearing MACP No. 564/2016 insofar as the quantum of compensation is concerned.

2. Vide the impugned award, the learned Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.6,94,022/- alongwith interest @6% per annum in favour of the petitioner. The said amount includes a lumpsum amount of Rs.2 lakhs awarded towards loss of future prospects.

3. The appellant seeks enhancement on two grounds, the first being that once the medical certificate clearly showed that the appellant was suffering from 34% permanent physical disability, the learned Tribunal could not have assessed his functional disability to be only 20%. The second ground on which enhancement is sought is that the amount of Rs.2 lakhs awarded towards loss of future earnings was highly inadequate.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the finding of the Tribunal that the petitioner's functional disability was only 20% is perverse and the petitioner is entitled to receive compensation by treating his disability at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top