SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2098

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Sukhbir & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Union of India. – Respondent
W.P.(C) 1406 of 2023 & CM APPL. 5243 of 2023
Decided On : 03-02-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Mayank Sharma and Ms. Divyanshi Maurya, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Naginder Benipal, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Vidhi, GP, Mr. Ankit Siwach and Ms. Harithi Kambiri, Advocates, for the Respondent.

The interpretation of the recruitment date in determining eligibility for the Old Pension Scheme.

Headnote:

Pension Scheme - Eligibility for Old Pension Scheme - Interpretation of Recruitment Date

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners sought inclusion in Old Pension Scheme based on their recruitment before the implementation of the New Pension Scheme.

Finding of the Court:

The Court disposed of the petition based on a previous judgment that had already decided the issue of eligibility for the Old Pension Scheme in similar cases.

Issues: Eligibility for Old Pension Scheme based on recruitment date

Ratio Decidendi: The Court relied on a previous judgment to dispose of the present petition, indicating that the issue had already been decided.

Final Decision: The petition and pending application were disposed of based on the previous judgment.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioners are seeking directions to the respondents to include the petitioners herein in Old Pension Scheme and grant benefits according to the Old Pension Scheme; quashing of OM dated 17.02.2020 issued by the respondent whereby stating that only those candidates whose results for recruitment were declared before 01.01.2004 against vacancies occurring on or before 31.12.2003 shall be eligible for coverage under the old pension scheme.

2. Learned counsel for petitioners submit that petitioners applied for and were appointed as personnel in CRPF on the basis of an advertisement for the post of Constable/GD in CRPF issued in September, 2003 i.e. much before the actual implementation of the New Pension Scheme. Hence, petitioners are eligible for Old Pension Scheme.

3. The issue(s) raised in the present petition has already been decided by this Court vide judgment dated 11.01.2023 passed in W.P.(C) 12712/2021 titled as Pawan Kumar and Ors vs. Union of India & Ors. and connected petitions.

4. In view of above, the present petition and pending application are disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top