SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Ramniwas - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 1451 of 2021 & CM Appls. 4168-69 of 2021
Decided On : 04-02-2021




Recruitment delays cannot deprive employees of benefits under the Old Pension Scheme when their appointment notifications were issued before the New Pension Scheme was implemented.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Old Pension Scheme - Writ petition filed for directions to treat petitioners as beneficiaries of Old Pension Scheme denied due to recruitment delays - Court cites precedent cases where similar relief was granted. (Paras 1-5)

(B) Legal Entitlement - Court held that petitioners from same recruitment batch as previous cases cannot be deprived of benefits due to technical delays. The court reinforces the principle of non-derogation of rights under statutory schemes. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners were recruited as Constable/Sub-Inspector in BSF on 07th January, 2004 instead of December 2003, leading to their assignment under the New Pension Scheme contrary to the Old Pension Scheme provisions.

Findings of Court:
The court directs respondents to extend benefits under the Old Pension Scheme to petitioners within eight weeks, reinforcing established legal principles from earlier rulings.

Issues: The principal issue was whether petitioners should be governed by the Old or New Pension Scheme despite their delayed recruitment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that recruitment notifications issued prior to the New Pension Scheme's implementation confer rights that cannot be undermined, asserting continuity in entitled benefits irrespective of procedural delays.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek old pension scheme benefits (Para 1 , 2)
2. cited precedents support petitioners' claims (Para 3 , 4)
3. no longer res integra; previous rulings apply (Para 5)
4. court directs extension of pension benefits (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to treat the petitioners as members of the Old Pension Scheme and extend the pensionary benefits as per the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners are Constable/Sub-Inspector with the BSF and due to a delay in conducting the medical test by the respondents, the petitioners were recruited on 07th January, 2004 instead of December, 2003 and in the meantime, the New Pension Scheme was implemented, and the petitioners were denied the benefits under the Old Pension Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that similarly situated persons of the same batch of 2003 had approached this Court by filing two writ petitions i.e. W.P.(C) No. 6680/2017 titled as Tanaka Ram and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. decided vide judgment dated 12th February, 2019 and WP(C) No. 8208/2020 titled as Sub Inspector/Min/M.R. Gurjar and Others vs. Union of India and Ors. decided vide judgment dated 15th January, 2021 wherein this Court directed the respondents to extend the benefits of the Old Pension Scheme.

4. Issue notice. Mr. Vishal Bakshi, Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. He states that in the present case, the recruitment process was completed post December, 2003 and therefore the petitioners are to be governed by the New Pension Scheme.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that issue involved in the present case is no longer res integra. This Court on 15th January, 2021 in the case of Sub Inspector/Min/M.R. Gurjar and Others (supra) has held as under:

    "13. Having regard to the fact that in the present batch of cases also the advertisement/notification was issued in September, 2003 and June, 2003 i.e. prior to coming into force of the present contributory pension scheme on 22nd December, 2003, this Court is of the view that petitioners cannot be deprived of the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme.

    14. This is more so when the batchmates of the petitioners are getting this benefit under various judgements passed by this Court."

6. Consequently, the petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to extend the benefits of Old Pension Scheme to each of the petitioners and pass consequential orders within a period of eight weeks from today.

7. Accordingly, the writ petition along with pending applications stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top