SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Ramniwas – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioners seek old pension scheme benefits (Para 1 , 2)
2. cited precedents support petitioners' claims (Para 3 , 4)
3. no longer res integra; previous rulings apply (Para 5)
4. court directs extension of pension benefits (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to treat the petitioners as members of the Old Pension Scheme and extend the pensionary benefits as per the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners are Constable/Sub-Inspector with the BSF and due to a delay in conducting the medical test by the respondents, the petitioners were recruited on 07th January, 2004 instead of December, 2003 and in the meantime, the New Pension Scheme was implemented, and the petitioners were denied the benefits under the Old Pension Scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that similarly situated persons of the same batch of 2003 had approached this Court by filing two writ petitions i.e. W.P.(C) No. 6680/2017 titled as Tanaka Ram and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. decided vide judgment dated 12th February,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top