SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2074

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Milan Saini – Appellant
Versus
Kamal Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin with Mr.Varun Nischal, Mr. Vaibhav Mishra and Ms. Harshita Gautam, Advocates with Mr Milan Saini/ petitioner via video conferencing,
Mr. Gautam Narayan, Amicus Curiae, for the Petitioner in O.M.P. (COMM) 361/2019 & I.A.15453/2022.
Mr. Anirudh Bakhru with Mr. Ayush Puri, Ms. Tejaswini Chandrashekhar, Mr. Umang Tyagi and Mr. Prateek Kumar Jha, Advocates, for the Decree Holder in OMP (CONT.) 1/2017.
Mr. Anirudh Bakhru with Mr. Ayush Puri, Mr. Tejaswini Chandrashekhar, Mr. Umang Tyagi and Mr. Prateek Kumar Jha, Advocates, for the R-1 O.M.P. (COMM) 361/2019 & I.A.15453/2022.
Ms. Kruttika Vijay, Advocate, for the R-2 in O.M.P. (COMM) 361/2019 & I.A.15453/2022.
Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin with Mr.Varun Nischal, Mr. Vaibhav Mishra and Ms. Harshita Gautam, Advocates with Mr Milan Saini via video conferencing, for Judgment Debtor in OMP (CONT.) 1/2017.
Mr. Gautam Narayan, Amicus Curiae, Ms. Nidhi Raman CGSC with Mr. Zubin Singh and Ms. Devika Bajaj, Advocates, for the UOI in OMP (CONT.) 1/2017.

JUDGMENT

Anup Jairam Bhambhani J.

CRL.M.A.19908/2022 in O.M.P. (COMM) 361/2019

CRL.M.A. 19909/2022 in OMP (CONT.) 1/2017

By way of the present application bearing Crl. M.A. No.19908/2022 filed in OMP (COMM.) No.361/2019 under section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ('Cr.P.C.' for short), the applicant Kamal Kumar, seeks action against the petitioner Milan Saini and his Special Power of Attorney-holder ('SPA-holder' for short) Siri Chand Saini inter-alia for committing perjury. Another application bearing Crl. M.A. No.19909/2022 has been filed by the same applicant in OMP (CONT.) No.1/2017 under section 340 Cr.P.C., containing identical allegations.

2. In view of the commonality of the allegations and issues involved, both applications are being decided by the present common judgment.

3. To crystallize the allegations made in the applications, reference may be made to the following paragraphs of one of the applications, which are mutatis mutandis the same in the other application:

    Paras of Crl. M.A. 19908/2022

    "8. That a bare look at the aforesaid purported signatures [on the documents listed at S. Nos. a to c of Para 7, above] of the alleged Attorney (Mr. Siri Chand Saini) v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top