Back
AMIT BANSAL
Aktiebolaget Volvo – Appellant
Versus
Volvo White Paints Industries – Respondent
JUDGMENT
I.A. 1921/2023 (O-XIII A R-2, 3 & 6 of CPC for Summary Judgment) & CS(COMM) 198/2022
1. The present suit has been filed seeking relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing the trademarks of the plaintiffs, passing off their goods as that of the plaintiffs. and other ancillary reliefs.
PLEADINGS IN THE PLAINT
2. The case set up by the plaintiffs in the plaint is as follows:
2.1. Plaintiff no.1, AB Volvo, plaintiff no.2, Volvo Trademark Holding AB and plaintiff no.3, Volvo Car Corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as 'the plaintiffs'), incorporated under the laws of Sweden, have their core business in transportation and automotive sector, including the business of manufacturing spare parts, accessories and ancillary parts for vehicles under the trademark 'VOLVO'.
2.2. Plaintiff no.1, incorporated on 5th May, 1915, executed a global deed of assignment in favour of plaintiff no.2, who became the subsequent proprietor of the plaintiffs. trademark 'VOLVO' and subsequently licensed the use of the trademark 'VOLVO' to plaintiffs no.1 and 3 in relation to their respective businesses.
2.3. Plaintiff no.1 is an international automotive and t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to grant a summary judgment in cases where the defendant has no real prospects of successfully defending the claim and fails ....
Infringement of well-known trademarks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the grant of permanent injunction and damages as remedies.
The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in a trademark infringement suit where the defendant manufactured 'lookalike' buses featuring the plaintiff's registered, well-known 'grille-slash'....
The court affirmed the validity of the plaintiffs' trademarks 'PENTA' and 'VOLVO PENTA', granting a permanent injunction against the defendants for infringement and passing off, emphasizing the marks....
The court affirmed the trademark's well-known status and granted interim protection against its unauthorized use, establishing a prima facie case of infringement by the defendant.
The plaintiff's rights as the registered proprietor of a well-known trademark were upheld, and the court applied the principles of trademark law to establish infringement and passing off by the defen....
The court affirmed that summary judgment can be granted when a defendant lacks a real prospect of successfully defending against claims of trademark infringement.
The court granted a summary judgment for trademark infringement due to the defendants' failure to contest the claims, establishing the plaintiff's rights in the 'MILLENNIUM' mark.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
