SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
J.R.MIDHA
Aktiebolaget Volvo – Appellant
Versus
Vaishali Travels – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiffs' established trademark rights in 'volvo' (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
2. defendant's misuse of the trademark 'volvo' (Para 14 , 15)
3. court recognizes prima facie case and issues interim order (Para 16 , 17)

ORDER

1. The hearing has been conducted through video conference.

I.A. No. 204/2021

2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

I.A. No. 205/2021

3. The plaintiff is seeking permission to leave to serve the interrogatories to defendant Nos.1 and 2.

4. This Court is satisfied that the interrogatories are relevant and the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 should be directed to answer to the interrogatories.

5. The application is therefore allowed and defendant Nos.1 and 2 are directed to reply to the interrogatories on affidavit within two weeks of receipt of the summons.

CS(COMM)6/2021 & I.A. Nos. 202/2021, 203/2021

6. The Plaintiffs have filed the present suit seeking reliefs of permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered trademarks, passing off, dilution and tarnishment of trademark, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up, transfer of domain name damages, costs etc.

7. It is submitted that Plaintiff No.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top