SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 2729

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Anil Kumar Dubey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Raghunath Pathak, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Raj Kumar Yadav, Senior Panel Counsel, Mr. Amit Acharya, Govt. Pleader & Ms. Rukhsar Jahan, Advocate, for the UOI.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following relief:

    "(i) Pass an order directing the respondent No. 2, I.T.B.P for deciding the representations made by the petitioner 11.08.2021"

2. We hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner made on 11.08.2021 within four weeks from today and the decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner in writing within one week thereafter.

3. The petition is disposed of.

4. Needless to say, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top