Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Suman - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 11783 of 2022 & CM Appl. 35125 of 2022
Decided On : 08-08-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks inquiry against specific respondents. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondents will decide the issue within four weeks. (Para 2) |
| 3. respondents must communicate decision to petitioner. (Para 3) |
| 4. petitioner can challenge decision if aggrieved; application disposed. (Para 4 , 5) |
Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks directions to the respondent Nos.1 & 2 to conduct proper inquiry against the respondent Nos.4 to 5 for not doing their duty despite directions passed by higher authority (AWWA) for enrolling the name of petitioner in the Part-II and directions to respondent No.2 to take proper action against the respondent Nos.3 to 5.
2. Learned counsel for respondents who is appearing on advance notice submits that the issue raised in the present petition by the petitioner shall be decided by the respondents within four weeks from today.
3. In view of above, respondents are directed to do needful within the time sought. Decision thereof shall be communicated by the respondents to the petitioner within one week thereafter.
4. Needless to say, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the decision to be taken, the petitioner may challenge the same before the appropriate Court.
5. Pending application also stands disposed of.
Court mandates administrative accountability and timely resolution of grievances regarding enrollment duties.
The court directs that a fresh representation must be made by the petitioner for promotion, ensuring a timely response from the competent authority.
Timely decision on representations is essential, and the court has the authority to direct the respondent to decide the representation within a specified timeframe.
Writ of Mandamus directed for consideration of petitioner's request for a house site patta within stipulated time.
The court directed the authority to consider a complaint without assessing its merits, ensuring compliance with procedural requirements.
The court mandates timely decision-making by government authorities regarding representations submitted by petitioners.
The court emphasized the necessity for timely completion of administrative inquiries to ensure due process.
The court emphasized the necessity for timely administrative action following an inquiry, highlighting accountability in educational governance.
The court reinforces the obligation of administrative authorities to adhere to procedural fairness in conducting inquiries under constitutional mandates.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
