Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Ram Prakash Bharti Force No. 880924754 – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks promotion and medical examination. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner directed to make fresh representation and seek relief. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. petition disposed of with directions. (Para 4) |
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to grant the next promotion to the petitioner and to medically examine the petitioner and prepare a final report.
2. In view of the submissions made in the present petition and the prayer sought, based on the new facts we hereby direct the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the competent authority for the aforesaid relief(s) within two weeks from today and on receipt of the same, the competent authority is directed to decide the same within four weeks thereafter and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner within one week thereafter.
3. Needless to say, if the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the decision to be taken, he may approach the appropriate forum.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition and pending application are disposed of.
The court directs that a fresh representation must be made by the petitioner for promotion, ensuring a timely response from the competent authority.
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making on representations for promotion.
Timely decision on representations is essential, and the court has the authority to direct the respondent to decide the representation within a specified timeframe.
Court mandates administrative accountability and timely resolution of grievances regarding enrollment duties.
Timely adjudication of representation seeking refixation of seniority.
Public authorities must respond timely to representations made to them, reinforcing procedural fairness and the right of individuals to receive decisions.
The court directed timely resolution of pending petitions, emphasizing the importance of administrative efficiency in handling mercy petitions.
The court emphasized the obligation to consider the petitioner's representation for promotion and communicate the decision within a specified timeframe.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
