Niranjan Singh vs State - 2023 Supreme(Del) 2696

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 2696

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Niranjan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ajay Digpaul and Mr. Kamal R. Digpaul, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Raghvinder Verma, APP, for the State. SI Kamal Chaudhary, PS Prem nagar, Ms.Mallika Parmar and Ms.Nitya Sharma, Advocates, for the Complainant.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide a detailed order dated 28.06.2021 the interim protection was granted by this court. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the charge-sheet in the present case has already been filed and even the charges have been framed upon the petitioner. It has been stated that there is no allegation against the petitioner that he has violated the interim protection granted to him by this court.

2. Since the charge sheet has already been filed, interim protection granted vide order dated 28.06.2021 stands confirmed.

3. The petitioner be admitted to court bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, subject to the following conditions:

a) the petitioner shall not leave the city;

b) the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case;

c) the petitioner shall provide his/her mobile number(s) to the Police Officer In Charge of the case and keep it operational at all times;

d) the petitioner shall d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document