Jasmair Singh vs State of Haryana - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1615

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 1615

UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Jasmair Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sunil Choudhary, Advocate, Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate, M/s. Mukesh Kumar Singh And Co., Advocate, For the Appellant / Mr. Alok Sangwan, AAG, Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Anurag Kulharia, Advocate, Mr. Apoorv Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Vipul Dahiya, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep, Advocate, Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate, Mr. Shahbaz Ahmadnaik, Advocate, Mr. Vishal Arun Mishra, Advocate, Mr. Hitesh Shahi, Advocate, Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Harshita Nigam, Advocate, Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Parshuram Paswan, Advocate, Mr. Ujjwal Bhardwaj, Advocate, Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, Advocate, For the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 07.04.2022 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CRM-M No. 974 of 2022.

3. The appellant husband is facing prosecution in crime registered pursuant to First Information Report No. 55 dated 14.02.2016 lodged with Police Station Pehowa, District Kurukshetra, Haryana, in respect of offences punishable under Sections 323, 406, 498-A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC" for short).

4. A Memo of Compromise dated 23.12.2021 was entered into between the appellant husband and respondent no. 2-wife in respect of all the pending litigations between the parties.

5. In accordance with said compromise, the appellant filed CRM-M No. 974 of 2022 under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ("Cr.P.C." for short) praying for quashing of the crime registered pursuant to First Information Report No. 55 of 2016. The request having been turned down, the instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant-husband.

6. It is not disputed that a settlement was arrived at between the appellant-husband and the respondent no. 2-wife.

7. Since the parties have buried the hatchet and have decided

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 1615

UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHATJasmair Singh – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Jasmair Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent