SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 447

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Mr. Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur, J
SMT. SANGEETA SUWALKA – Appellant
Versus
MAHARSHI DAYANAND SARASWATI UNIVERSITY – Respondent
CW / 3354 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Manoj Bhandari Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Ojas Gupta and Mr. Prateek Surana

A student who fails in required subjects is not entitled to progress to the final year of study, even under interim orders, unless eligibility criteria are met.

Headnote:(A) Education Law - Examination Regulations - The petitioner, having failed in Jurisprudence in both the main and supplementary examinations, was not entitled to enter the Final Year LLB course despite having cleared it under an interim order - The procedure for re-evaluation was upheld, and no markings on answer sheets do not invalidate the checking process. (Paras 5, 6, 7)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - The court clarified that no right is created by interim orders if the underlying eligibility criteria are not met, and the petitioner must reappear for the II Year examination. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner failed in three subjects but was re-evaluated and passed in two. She subsequently failed in Jurisprudence again and sought permission to appear in the Final Year examination, which was granted under an interim order.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner had not met the necessary criteria to advance to the Final Year and upheld the university's examination regulations regarding re-evaluation.

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioner could be allowed to appear in the Final Year examination despite failing Jurisprudence and the validity of the re-evaluation process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the interim order did not create an entitlement to advance without meeting the necessary examination requirements, and the re-evaluation process was valid as per university regulations.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Order :

1. Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner.

2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner appeared in the II year of the LLB examination from the respondent-MDSU University, Ajmer. However, she was declared failed in three subjects, namely Jurisprudence, Law of Crimes & Penal Code and Constitutional Law of India and, therefore, she applied for re-evaluation of her answer sheets/copies. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that on re-evaluation of the answer sheets/copies, the petitioner was declared passed in two subjects namely Law of Crimes & Penal Code and Constitutional Law of India and, therefore, as a result, she appeared in the supplementary examination for the subject of Jurisprudence. He submits that in the supplementary examination for Jurisprudence, the petitioner was again declared failed and, therefore, under the directions of this Court, the petitioner again applied for re- evaluation of the answer-sheets/copies from the supplementary examination of Jurisprudence, wherein, in the re-evaluation of the answer-sheet/copy of supplementary examination for Jurisprudence, she was once again declared failed as she could not secure the required passing marks.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that, in the meanwhile, after the II Year examination, the petitioner was permitted to appear in the final year examination in pursuance of the interim order granted by this Court, and she successfully cleared the final year examination. He further submits that as per the photocopies of the answer sheets/copies provided by the University, there are no markings indicating that the answer sheets/copies have been checked, and no marks have been awarded to the petitioner. He, therefore, prays that the petitioner may again be allowed to appear in the upcoming examination of Jurisprudence for clearing the subject.

4. I have considered the submissions made at the Bar and have gone through the relevant records of the case.

5. The factual matrix narrated above clearly show that the petitioner failed to clear both the main exam as well as the supplementary exam of Jurisprudence in the II year, despite there being a re-evaluation of the answer sheets/copies in both the exams. It is a settled position that a person will be entitled to enter into the Final Year of LLB course only if he/she has cleared the II Year examination. However, during the proceedings of re- evaluation, the petitioner was permitted to appear in the Final year examination and she successfully cleared the same but, as the petitioner was permitted to appear in the final year examination in pursuance of the interim order granted by this Court, therefore, no right has been created in her favour.

6. The contention of the Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that the answer sheets/copies have not been checked as there are no markings on the same is not valid and is noted to be rejected on the ground that on the front page of every answer sheet/copy, there is a check-list, which is required to be filled in by the examiner without making any markings inside the answer sheet/copy. This procedure is intended to ensure that in case, if any answer-sheet/copy is sent for re-evaluation, then the examiner conducting re-evaluation may not get influenced by the marks awarded by the earlier examiner.

7. Since, the petitioner failed to clear the paper of Jurisprudence in II year, therefore, there is no question to permit her to appear in the Final year examination and the provisions of the University also do not permit to do so. Therefore, she is required to undergo the II year examination again and no relief can be granted to the petitioner in the present writ petition.

8. In view of the discussion made above, there is no force in the writ petition and the same is, therefore, dismissed.

9. Stay petition and other pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top