Back
MINI PUSHKARNA
Narender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Land And Building Departmentt – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing]
Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition has been filed with prayer for directions to the respondents to review/modify their observation and re-open the file bearing no. F.30 (86)/8971/2008/L&B/ALT, titled as Sh. Surjan Singh S/o Lt. Sh. Charta, Village Kotla Mahi Gram, Delhi.
2. It is submitted that the aforesaid file has been closed by the respondents wherein the father of the petitioner had filed an application vide diary no. 1396 dated 16.09.2008 for allotment of alternative plot in lieu of the acquired land of the petitioner/Predecessor-In-Interest of the petitioner. Thus, there is prayer for allotment of alternative plot to the petitioner being legal heir of late Sh. Surjan Singh in lieu of acquired land bearing khasra no. 221/1(01-06), 224/1(02-02), 223/1 (03-00), 225/1 (00-05), 225/1/2 (00-06), 221/2 (03-05), 223/2 (00-05), 223/3 (01-11) & 224/2 (02-14) total measuring 14 bighas 14 biswas, situated in the revenue estate of Village Kotla Mahi Gram, New Delhi, to the extent of their respective share i.e. 1/9 share in accordance with the scheme/policy of the Government.
3. Perusal of the records show that the claim of the
The court's decision emphasized the need to consider ancestral property in extended abadi areas and directed the respondent authority to reconsider the case for alternate allotment of land.
Failure to take necessary legal steps can result in the disposal of a petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the documents submitted by the petitioner and granting them an opportunity of hearing in the case of allotment of an alternative plot.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's claim for an alternative plot was allowed based on the finding that the petitioner's land was acquired completely, and the co....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner afresh on the basis of the documents filed by the petitioner in the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for authorities to consider the evidence provided by the petitioner and grant them an opportunity to appear and submit documents fo....
Fair consideration of evidence and granting the petitioner an opportunity to present their case before the Scrutiny Committee.
The jurisdiction of the Civil Courts is barred with respect to the claims/proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, and the petitioner was provided with the liberty to seek legal remedies under the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
