Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Roshan Real Estate Pvt Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as `the Arbitration Act') has been filed on behalf of the petitioner assailing the Arbitral Award dated 12th March 2022 and seeking the following reliefs:
"a. To set aside the impugned Award dated 12.03.2022 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal with respect to the Claim No. 6.
b. Award costs of the proceedings in favor of the Petitioner and against the Respondent;
c. Pass such further order(s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case."
2. The facts delineated hereunder have led to the filing of the instant petition before this Court:
a. The petitioner is a private limited company engaged in the business of civil engineering infrastructure projects. The respondent invited tenders for the work of `Construction of Office Building for ASI at 24 Tilak Marg, New Delhi including Electrical Installation' for an estimated cost of Rs. 24,85,51,972/-. The petitioner was declared the successful bidder for the said work vide letter No. 3983 dated 27th September 2012 and accordingly, the parties also execute
An arbitral award must stay within the bounds of the arbitration agreement; claims exceeding this scope can be annulled, underscoring limited judicial interference in arbitration matters.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the correct interpretation and application of contractual provisions in arbitration disputes.
An arbitral award must provide clear and intelligible reasoning; lack thereof renders it void under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
The court emphasized the requirement for the arbitrator to assign reasons in support of the award and the limited scope of interference by the court in arbitration awards.
The scope of interference with an Arbitral Award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is fairly limited and narrow. The Courts shall not sit in an appeal while adjudicating ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
