Back
MINI PUSHKARNA
Tanish Parcha (minor) Through His Next Friend And Mother Jaivindri – Appellant
Versus
Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[Physical Hearing/ Hybrid Hearing]
Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral)
1. In the present case the petitioner child had been denied admission on the ground that the child was studying in New Delhi District, wherein the Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya (JNV) Scheme was not applicable. Therefore, he was held as not entitled to admission in Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya.
2. It manifests from the record that pursuant to the order dated 15.01.2020, the petitioner was directed to be admitted in the school as an interim relief.
3. Thus, it is seen that petitioner was granted admission in Grade 6 in the Academic Session 2019-20 in the respondent school and has been continuing his studies since then. As of now, the petitioner in question is studying in Class 10th. Thus, it is seen that the child has already spent four Academic Sessions in the respondent school and now being in class 10th, he would be taking the Class 10th CBSE Board Examinations in the current Academic Session i.e. 2023-24. It is to be noted that for CBSE Board Examinations for class 10th, registration is done by the CBSE in previous class i.e. in Class 9th itself. Thus, the petitioner in the present case would also have been registe
The court upheld the right of the petitioner child to continue education in the school where admission was granted, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and previous relevant ....
Court's authority to direct admission in a newly allotted school under the EWS/DG category
Admission policies must not infringe upon a child's fundamental right to education, particularly where exceptional circumstances arise.
The court's decision was influenced by the acceptance of the petitioner's admission under the EWS/DG category by the respondent-school.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a writ petition seeking directions to a school for a change in stream in Class XI becomes infructuous if the academic session is already over ....
Unjust denial of admission based on financial grounds and the right to education. Reasonable accommodation for payment of fees in installments.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the denial of admission to the petitioners was unjustified and not supported by the provisions of Sec. 15 of the Act of 2009, which guarantees....
The main legal principle established is the obligation of the Directorate of Education to consider allotting schools for admission of children under the EWS/DG category in different classes based on ....
The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the petitioner's ward had already been granted admission by the school.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
