SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1214

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Mohd. Danish – Appellant
Versus
The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
Bail Appln. 644 of 2023
Decided On : 02-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Saroj Kumar Jha with Ms. Meenu Jha, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Amit Sahni, APP for the State.

The court may extend interim bail on humanitarian grounds based on the medical condition of the petitioner's family member, despite the petitioner's undesirable conduct.

Headnote:

BAIL APPLICATION - Extension of Interim Bail - Court extended interim bail on humanitarian grounds due to medical condition of petitioner's wife

Fact of the Case:

The accused filed an application seeking an extension of interim bail on the ground of his wife's medical condition. The trial court had previously granted interim bail due to the illness of the accused's mother.

Finding of the Court:

The court extended the interim bail till 09.03.2023 on humanitarian grounds, despite finding the conduct of the petitioner undesirable. The petitioner was directed to surrender on 09.03.2023.

Issues: Extension of interim bail, humanitarian grounds, petitioner's conduct

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the medical documents and the petitioner's undertaking to surrender on a specific date, leading to the extension of interim bail on humanitarian grounds.

Final Decision: The court extended the interim bail till 09.03.2023 and recorded that the conduct of the petitioner was undesirable.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 5236/2023 & CRL.M.A. 5237/2023 (exemption)

Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions.

BAIL APPLN. 644/2023

1. This is an application seeking an extension of interim bail for a period of 3 months filed on behalf of the accused. The accused was granted interim bail by the Learned Trial Court vide order dated 20.01.2023 till 27.01.2023 on the ground of illness of the mother of the petitioner. The interim bail granted was extended from time to time vide orders dated 04.02.2023 and 13.02.2023 till 20.02.2023. However, the accused did not surrender on 20.02.2023 and moved another application for an extension of interim bail for the period of 3 months on the medical ground of his wife. Petitioner took the plea that on 19.02.2023, the wife of the accused fell down the stairs and her backbone was fractured. It was stated that the doctor had advised her to bed rest for 2 months.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the wife of the petitioner is totally bedridden and the learned Trial Court has wrongly rejected the application for an extension of interim bail.

3. Learned Addl. P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the extension of interim bail. It has been submitted that the petitioner is not entitled to any discretionary relief as he has failed to surrender despite the expiry of the interim bail period. Learned Addl. P.P. for the State submits that if the interim bail is extended, it will condone the petitioner's illegal act.

4. The petitioner along with the petition has filed the medical documents. Perusal of the medical documents indicates that the wife of the petitioner had fallen from the staircase and has pain in her lower back and hips and has been advised bed rest for 2 months. The conduct of the petitioner certainly does not entitle him for an extension of interim bail. However, during the course of submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner shall surrender on 09.03.2023 after making suitable arrangements for his wife.

5. In view of the above submission made, the interim bail of the petitioner is extended till 09.03.2023 on the same terms and conditions as imposed by the Learned Trial Court vide order dated 20.01.2023. The petitioner shall surrender positively on 09.03.2023 before the concerned Jail, Superintendent, without any fail.

6. This Court makes it clear that this order has been passed purely on humanitarian grounds and records that the conduct of the petitioner was undesirable.

7. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not press the petition any further.

8. With these observations, the present petition stands disposed of.

9. Copy of the order is given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top