SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1245

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Iqbal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Additional District Magistrate – Respondent
W.P.(C) 1634 of 2023
Decided On : 06-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Udaibir Singh Kochar, Mr. Aditya Bakshi, Mr. Varun Rajawat, Ms. Tulna Rampal & Ms. Deepali Dasgupta, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, Mr. Aditiya Raj & Mr. Sudhir, Advocates, for the GNCTD.

The court emphasized the importance of addressing the delay in issuance of certified copies and the serious concern regarding missing records, highlighting the potential threat of misuse and the significant impact on citizens' rights.

Headnote:

Certified Copies - Delay in Issuance - Court directs officials to produce original file and dispatch register in response to missing records from offices of officials

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition seeking certified copies of a case file, alleging delay in issuance despite repeated visits and representations to the office of the respondent.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the records related to valuable lands were missing from the offices of officials, posing a threat of misuse and significantly impacting citizens' rights.

Issues: Delay in issuance of certified copies, missing records from officials' offices, and the potential threat of misuse of documents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court directed the concerned officials to appear in court with the original file and dispatch register, and to provide a clear affidavit and copy of the order dated 28th February, 2022, along with the present position of the official who passed the order.

Final Decision: The court listed the matter for the next hearing and directed the officials to produce the required documents and information.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed seeking certified copies of the case file 'Gaon Sabha, Bijwasan vs. Ballu Ram & Ors.' bearing Appeal No. 148/03 having Case ID 14758. The case of the Petitioner is that despite repeated visits to the office of the Respondent and repeated representations being written, the certified copies are not being issued.

3. Copy of the affidavit filed on behalf of the GNCTD, is taken on record. Let the copy of the original counter affidavit be placed on record by Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ld. Counsel.

4. As per the affidavit deposed by Mr. Balram Meena, Additional District Magistrate, Kapashera, New Delhi which has been handed over today, it appears that an order was passed in this matter on 28th February, 2022. The Petitioner applied for a copy of the same on 22nd March, 2022. However, no copy was provided. The said alleged order dated 28th February 2022 has still not been produced even before this Court. Today, the affidavit placed on record of Mr. Meena is to the effect that the file was consigned to the record room and upon searching, the same could not be traced. It is also claimed that an office order dated 20th December 2022 had been issued by the deponent directing all the SDMs concerned to search the file in their respective offices. However, despite repeated efforts, the same file could not be traced.

5. Further, upon perusing through the counter affidavit it is seen that the dispatch register does not match as to when the file was consigned to the record room. The typed chart claims that the record was sent on 8th March, 2022 to Mr. Mukesh Patwari (Record Keeper, Kapashera). The Bailiff - Mr. Ravindra Kumar, who is present in Court submits that the Patwari was Mr. Manoj Kumar at the relevant point of time. It is noticed by this Court that in a large number of matters, records are going missing from the offices of the Sub-Registrars and other officials. Repeatedly the Court is taking notice of the same and enquiries are being directed. This is a matter of serious concern and the officials are behaving in a callous and casual manner. Considering that these are valuable lands which these documents relate to, the missing of such records has a significant bearing on rights of citizens and there is a threat of misuse of the documents.

6. Considering the above, the following officials shall be present in Court at the next date of hearing:

i) Mr. Balram Meena - current ADM, South-West District, Kapashera, New Delhi;

ii) Mr. Rakesh Dahiya, ADM, South West who has allegedly passed the order dated 28th February, 2022 irrespective of wherever he is posted currently;

iii) Mr. Manoj Kumar Patwari (Kanungo), Kapashera who is stated to have received the file on 8th March, 2022;

iv) Mr. Mukesh Patwari, the Record Keeper (Kapashera) whose name is mentioned in the typed chart handed over to the Court in the counter affidavit filed today.

7. The above officials shall carry the original file relating to the property, subject matter of the present petition.

8. In addition, the original dispatch register shall also be produced on the next date of hearing.

9. A clear affidavit shall also be placed on record stating as to who were the officials who passed the order dated 28th February, 2022 along with the copy of the said order shall also be placed on record. The present position of the said official who had passed the order dated 28th February, 2023 shall also be placed on record.

10. List on 10th April, 2023 on top of the board at 10:30 a.m.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top