Back
C. HARI SHANKAR
Sukam Systems Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Lithium Power Energy Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
C. Hari Shankar, J.
1. The plaintiff alleges, by the present suit, infringement, by the defendant, of the plaintiff's registered trademarks "Su-Kam", "BIG Conqueror Tubular Battery" and "BIG Warrior Tubular Battery", specifically the marks registered under Registration Nos. 821727, 2213106 and 22103109. Consequently, it is alleged, the defendant is seeking to pass off its goods as those of the plaintiff. A tabular statement of the registrations held by the plaintiff is contained in para 16 of the plaint and may be reproduced thus:
| Trademark | Date of Application | Registration No. | Class | Status |
| [IMG] | 05/10/1998 | 821727 | Class 9 - Electrical apparatus & instruments - invertors, CVR - Constant Voltage Receiver, UPS Uninterrupt -ed Power Supply | Registered |
| [IMG] | 09/03/2006 | 1430351 | Class 9 - Electrical apparatus & instruments - invertors, CVR - Constant Voltage Receiver, UPS Uninterrupt- ed Power Supply | Registered |
| [IMG] | 31/01/2012 | 2274722 | Class 9 - Inverter and battery | Registered |
| [IMG] | 29/09/2011 | 2213106 | Class 9 - Inverter and battery | Registered |
| [IMG] | 29/09/2011 | 2213109 | Class 9 - Inverter and battery | Registered |
2. The plaint asserts that the mark SU-KAM is owned by the plaintiff and is in
The court upheld the exclusive ownership of registered trademarks and granted a permanent injunction to prevent infringement and passing off of goods.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of prior use and the principles of honest adoption, delay, and acquiescence in trademark disputes.
Trademark infringement occurs when a registered mark's rights surpass an unregistered mark's claims, especially when confusion is likely.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the protection of trademarks, the likelihood of confusion or deception arising from the similarity of marks, and the prima facie case of infringeme....
Point of law: Registration of trademark shall, if valid, give to registered proprietor of trademark exclusive right to use of trademark in relation to goods or services in respect of which trademark ....
Registered trademarks can acquire protective rights against infringement even if they are descriptive when they establish secondary meaning associated with the product.
Important Point :The use of a trademark that is phonetically and visually similar to a registered trademark can lead to confusion, constituting infringement, especially when dishonest conduct is evid....
The court affirmed the registered trademark holder's rights against similar marks and clarified standards for proving prior use and confusion under trademark law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the recognition and protection of a 'well-known' trademark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and the Copyright Act, 1957, based on extensive use, re....
The court established that the rights of the prior user of a trademark are superior to those of a subsequent user, emphasizing the elements of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage in passing off c....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
