SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 911

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Vikas Mahajan, JJ.
Aruneema Devnath – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar Devnath – Respondent
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 27 of 2019
Decided On : 21-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Akriti Tyagi, Advocate, for the Appellant with appellant in person.
Ms. Anuradha Dixit, Mr. Manish Kumar and Mr. Pravesh Kumar, Advocates, for the Respondent with respondent in person.

The court has the discretion to allow parties to settle their disputes and convert a petition under the Hindu Marriage Act into a petition for grant of divorce by mutual consent, considering the waiver of the statutory period and the undertakings made by the parties.

Headnote:

Divorce - Mutual Consent - Settlement Agreement

Fact of the Case:

Parties settled their disputes and agreed to apply for grant of divorce by mutual consent. Respondent undertakes to pay a sum of Rs.75 lakhs in full and final settlement of all claims of the appellant towards alimony. The petition filed by the respondent under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is converted into a petition for grant of divorce by mutual consent.

Finding of the Court:

The oral prayer of the parties is allowed, and the petition filed by the respondent is allowed to be amended. The amended petition is directed to be filed before the Family Court, and the parties shall be personally present for recording of their respective statements under Section 13B (1) of the Act. The Family Court may grant waiver of the statutory period of six months based on the parties' separation and litigation history. The respondent undertakes to make payments at specific stages, and the appellant undertakes to withdraw her petition upon grant of divorce by mutual consent.

Issues: Settlement of disputes, conversion of petition, waiver of statutory period, payment undertakings, withdrawal of petition

Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the parties to settle their disputes and convert the petition into a mutual consent divorce petition. It also considered the waiver of the statutory period and the undertakings made by the parties in reaching its decision.

Final Decision: The appeal is disposed of in accordance with the settlement agreement, and the impugned order stands merged in this order.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

1. The Court had prolong interaction with the parties, after interaction, parties have settled their disputes.

2. It is agreed that parties shall apply for grant of divorce by mutual consent. Respondent undertakes to pay a sum of Rs.75 lakhs in full and final settlement of all the claims of the appellant towards past, present and future alimony.

3. It is agreed between the parties that amount of Rs.75 lakhs shall be divided equally between the appellant and the two daughters i.e., Vidhisha and Archana i.e., Rs.25 lakhs each.

4. It is agreed that the petition filed by the respondent under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) bearing HMA No. 243/2019, titled Vijay Kumar Devnath Vs. Aruneema Devnath be converted into a petition for grant of divorce by mutual consent. Leave is granted.

5. In view of the above, the oral prayer of the parties is allowed, the petition filed under Section 13 (1) of the Act by the respondent/husband is allowed to be amended and the petition filed by the respondent/husband under Section 13 (1) of the Act being HMA No.243/2019, titled Vijay Kumar Devnath Vs. Aruneema Devnath, is converted into a petition under Section 13B (1) of the Act on the records of the Family Court.

6. The amended petition duly signed and supported by respective affidavits of the parties is directed to be filed before the Family Court on 15.04.2023, when the matter is already stated to be listed before the Family Court.

7. Parties shall be personally present before the Family Court for recording of their respective statements under Section 13B (1) of the Act on 15.04.2023. It is also directed that the parties shall move the petition under Section 13B (2) within the outer limit of three months from today as undertaken.

8. On an application being filed, seeking waiver of the statutory period of six months, the Family Court shall take into account the fact that the parties have separated in 2015 and have been litigating since March, 2015 and grant waiver of the statutory period of six month as prescribed under Section 13 (B) (2).

9. The respondent undertakes to pay an amount of Rs.25 lakhs (Rs.15 lakhs to the appellant and Rs.5 lakhs each to the two daughters) at the time of recording of the statement of the first motion.

10. Respondent further undertakes to pay the balance amount of Rs. 50 lakhs (Rs. 10 lakhs to the appellant and Rs. 20 lakhs each to the daughters) at the time of recording of the statement on the second motion for grant of divorce by way of mutual consent.

11. Appellant further undertakes that on payment of the said amount, all her claims towards past, present and future alimony shall be fully and finally settled and on grant of divorce by mutual consent she shall withdraw her petition i.e., HMA No.917/2016, titled Aruneema Devnath Vs. Vijay Kumar Devnath listed before Family Court on 12.07.2023.

12. Undertakings are accepted.

13. Appeal is disposed of in the above terms and the impugned order dated 03.12.2018 shall stand merged in this order.

14. Order dasti under signature of the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top