SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1210

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Vikas Mahajan, JJ.
Vijay Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Alka Sharma – Respondent
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 107 of 2021 & CM APPL. 40150 of 2021
Decided On : 06-03-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rajive Maini and Ms. Shriya Maini, Advocates, for the Appellant with appellant in person and his mother.
Mr. Shalabh Bhardwaj and Mr. Rajat Rajoria Singh, Advocates, for the Respondent.

The court can set aside previous orders and allow amendments to petitions based on settlement agreements and mutual consent of the parties.

Headnote:

Settlement Agreement - Divorce Petition - The court set aside the previous order and allowed the petition for divorce to be amended into a petition for divorce by mutual consent, based on the settlement agreement between the parties.

Fact of the Case:

The parties settled their disputes and executed a settlement agreement. The court set aside the previous order and allowed the petition for divorce to be amended into a petition for divorce by mutual consent.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the settlement agreement between the parties warranted setting aside the previous order and allowing the petition for divorce to be amended into a petition for divorce by mutual consent.

Issues: Settlement agreement, amendment of petition for divorce

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the settlement agreement and the parties' mutual consent to amend the petition for divorce.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition for divorce to be amended into a petition for divorce by mutual consent based on the settlement agreement between the parties.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

1. Parties are present in person along with their respective counsels. The parties have settled their disputes and a settlement agreement dated 06.03.2023 has been executed. The original settlement agreement is produced in Court. The same is taken on record.

2. Both the parties undertake and assure that they have duly signed the settlement agreement and undertake to abide by the respective obligations in the settlement agreement.

3. In terms of the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 15 lakhs by way three pay orders bearing Nos. 385520 dated 02.03.2023, 385521 dated 02.03.2023 & 385502 dated 21.02.2023 for a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/-, Rs. 6,00,000/- & Rs. 6,00,000/-, respectively is to be paid to the respondent in full and final settlement of all her past, present and future claims towards dowry, stridhan, gifts, maintenance, permanent alimony, etc. The pay orders, in original, have been produced. The photocopy of the same are annexed with the application. The settlement agreement is taken on record.

4. The respective undertakings of the parties are accepted. Parties are bound down to the statements given to the Court.

5. In view of the settlement agreement, the impugned order dated 08.04.2021 whereby the petition filed for divorce under Section 13(1) (ia) and Section 13(1) (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was dismissed, is set aside. The petition is restored to its original number on the record of the Family Court.

6. Parties pray that leave be granted to amend the petition into a petition for divorce by mutual consent.

7. In view of the above settlement, the oral prayer of the parties is allowed, the petition filed under Section 13 (1) of the Act by the respondent/husband is allowed to be amended and the petition filed by the respondent/husband under Section 13 (1) of the Act being HMA No. 107/2021, titled Vijay Bhardwaj Vs. Smt. Alka Sharma, is converted into a petition under Section 13B (1) of the Act on the records of the Family Court.

8. The amended petition duly signed and supported by respective affidavit of parties is directed to be filed before the Family Court on 14.03.2023.

9. Parties shall be personally present before the Family Court on 14.03.2023 for recording of their respective statements under Section 13B (1) of the Act.

10. On an application being filed, seeking waiver of the statutory period of six months, the Family Court shall take into account the fact that the parties have separated in 2016 and have been litigating since September, 2016 and grant waiver of the statutory period of six month as prescribed under Section 13 (B) (2).

11. Respondent/wife undertakes that she shall cooperate in quashing of FIR No. 197/2017 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, Police Station Dabri, South-West District, Delhi.

12. The undertakings are accepted.

13. Appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

14. Order dasti under signature of the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top