IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Vikas Mahajan, JJ.
Ankur Kohli – Appellant
Versus
Vinita Kohli – Respondent
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 134 of 2020 & CM APPL.27953 of 2020
Decided On : 14-03-2023
Divorce - Mutual Consent - Settlement Agreement
Fact of the Case:
The appellant sought divorce under Section 13 (1)(i)(a) and 13(1)(i)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the ground of cruelty and desertion, which was initially dismissed. However, the parties settled their disputes and executed a memorandum of understanding.
Finding of the Court:
The court set aside the impugned order, allowed the petition to be amended to a petition under Section 13B(1) of the Act, and granted waiver of the statutory period of six months due to the parties' separation and litigation since 2011.
Issues: Divorce under Section 13 (1)(i)(a) and 13(1)(i)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, settlement agreement, amendment of petition to Section 13B(1) of the Act, waiver of statutory period of six months.
Ratio Decidendi: The court allowed the amendment of the petition to a mutual consent divorce under Section 13B(1) of the Act and granted waiver of the statutory period of six months based on the parties' separation and prolonged litigation.
Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of, and the order was given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. The memorandum of understanding dated 14.03.2023 formed part of the order and was supplied to the parties.
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)
1. Appellant impugns the order dated 07.11.2019 where by the petition filed by the appellant seeking divorce under Section 13 (1)(i)(a) and 13(1)(i)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the ground of cruelty and desertion has been dismissed.
2. Parties have settled their disputes and a memorandum of understanding dated 14.03.2023 has been executed. The parties are present in person and also represented by their respective counsel. Parties confirm the settlement terms.
3. We have perused the terms of settlement and find the same under law. The parties who are present in person undertake that they shall abide by the respective terms and conditions and obligations as contained in the Memorandum of Understanding dated 14.03.2023. The original Memorandum of Understanding dated 14.03.2023 has been produced before the Court duly signed by the parties and their respective counsel. The same is taken on record.
4. Parties have agreed to dissolve their marriage by obtaining divorce by mutual consent. Appellant husband has undertaken to pay a sum of Rs.22 lacs towards past, present and future maintenance of the respondent.
5. The amount of Rs.22 lacs is payable in three instalments. A sum of Rs.7.50,000/- at the time of recording of statement of first motion and another sum of Rs. 7.50,000/- at the time of recording of statement of second motion. Balance amount of Rs.7 lacs is to be paid at the time of quashing of FIR No. 266/2011 under Section 498A/406 IPC, Police Station Mukherjee Nagar.
6. Respondent undertakes that on payment of said amount of Rs.7 lacs she shall cooperate with quashing of the FIR and give her no objection qua the same.
7. Parties pray that the divorce petition filed by the appellant be restored and be permitted to be amended to a petition under Section 13B of the Act.
8. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 07.11.2019 is set aside, the petition is restored to its original number on the record of the Family Court.
9. In view of the above statement and prayer of the parties, the petition is allowed to be amended and the petition filed by the appellant's husband under Section 13 (1) of the Act being HMA No.272/2014 is converted to a petition under Section 13B(1) of the Act on the record of the Family Court.
10. The amended petition duly signed and supported by respective affidavits of parties be filed before the Family Court on 27.03.2023.
11. On an application being filed seeking waiver of the statutory period of six months, the Family Court shall take into account the fact that parties have separated in the year 2010 and have been litigating since the year 2011 and grant waiver of the statutory period of six months as prescribed under Section 13B(2) of the Act.
12. Parties shall be personally present before the Family Court on 27.03.2023 for recording of their respective statements under Section 13 B(1) and 13B(2) of the Act.
13. The appeal is accordingly disposed of in above terms.
14. The order be given dasti under signatures of Court Master. Copy of Memorandum of Understanding dated 14.03.2023 shall form the part of this order and be also supplied to the parties under signature of the Court Master.
The court can set aside previous orders and allow amendments to petitions based on settlement agreements and mutual consent of the parties.
The court recognized the validity and influence of a settlement agreement in setting aside a decree of divorce and converting a petition into a mutual consent divorce petition under the Hindu Marriag....
Mutual consent for divorce allows for waiving the statutory period under the Hindu Marriage Act, facilitating the resolution of family disputes amicably.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to allow the amendment and conversion of a divorce petition under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the consideration of ....
Parties may resolve disputes through mutual consent and valid Settlement Agreements to expedite divorce proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of mutual consent in seeking divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the court's discretion to grant wai....
The court has the discretion to allow parties to settle their disputes and convert a petition under the Hindu Marriage Act into a petition for grant of divorce by mutual consent, considering the waiv....
The court upheld the principle of mutual consent in divorce proceedings and exercised discretion to grant waiver of the statutory period based on the circumstances of the case.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to allow the amendment of a petition for divorce based on a settlement agreement between the parties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.