SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4725

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Pawan – Appellant
Versus
Mange Ram Gupta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Kunal Soni, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. This revision petition has been filed by the Petitioners ('tenants') assailing the order dated 01.06.2015, passed by the Additional Rent Controller (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi ('Trial Court'), in Eviction Petition No. E-07/2014, whereby, their application seeking leave to defend was dismissed and the eviction petition filed by the Respondents ('landlords') under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 ('DRC Act') was allowed with respect to Shop No. 25, Central Road, Bhogal, Jangpura, New Delhi-110014. ('tenanted premises').

1.1. The tenanted premises is situated in property bearing no. 29, Church Lane, Bhogal, Jangpura, New Delhi-110014, which admeasures 342 sq. yards. The said property was originally owned by late Mr. Chhagan Mal and he divided the said property between his two sons i.e., late Mr. Ram Swaroop and late Mr. Kallu Mal. The partition of the said property was made in two equal halves of 171 sq. yards each between the legal heirs of late Mr. Ram Swaroop and late Mr. Kallu Mal, which has been duly recorded in the judgment dated 19.12.2022 passed by the Division Bench in FAO(OS) 137/2022.

1.2. The judgment dated 19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top