Sunil Kumar vs Ankur Jain - 2023 Supreme(Del) 1352

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 1352

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ankur Jain – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Avi Singh, Mr. Shikhar Garg and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (Oral)

[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]

CM APPL. 17253/2023 and 17254/2023 (Exemption)

1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 568/2023, CM APPL. 17251/2023 & CM APPL. 17252/2023

3. Mr. Avi Singh appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed the contempt application on 14.04.2022. Learned counsel submits that though the notice was issued, however, neither reply has been filed nor has the learned Trial Court adjudicated the said contempt application.

4. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner had also filed second contempt application on 21.01.2023, however, no notice yet on the said contempt application has been issued till date.

5. Learned counsel submits that an application under Order XV Rule 5 of CPC, 1908 was filed on 26.08.2022 seeking direction to the respondent to deposit arrears of monthly charges, which is still pending before the learned Trial Court since then.

6. Learned counsel makes a request that a direction to the learned Trial Court be issued to hear and dispose of the aforesaid applications expeditiously. Learned counse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document