IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tushar Rao Gedela, J.
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ankur Jain & Ors. – Respondents
CM(M) 568 of 2023
Decided On : 11-04-2023
Exemption - Contempt Application - The court allowed exemption subject to all just exceptions and disposed of the application. The petitioner requested a direction to the Trial Court to hear and dispose of pending applications expeditiously, which the court granted in accordance with Delhi High Court Circular No. 69/Rules/DHC.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a contempt application and an application under Order XV Rule 5 of CPC, 1908 seeking direction to the respondent to deposit arrears of monthly charges. The Trial Court had not adjudicated on the contempt application or the pending applications, and the petitioner requested a direction to the Trial Court to expedite the process.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted exemption, dispensed with notice to the respondent, and directed the Trial Court to hear and dispose of the pending applications expeditiously in accordance with the Delhi High Court Circular.
Issues: Delay in adjudication of contempt application and pending applications, and the need for a direction to the Trial Court to expedite the process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Delhi High Court Circular No. 69/Rules/DHC to grant the requested direction to the Trial Court and expedite the process of hearing and disposing of the pending applications.
Final Decision: The court allowed exemption, dispensed with notice to the respondent, and directed the Trial Court to hear and dispose of the pending applications expeditiously.
JUDGMENT
Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (Oral)
[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]
CM APPL. 17253/2023 and 17254/2023 (Exemption)
1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 568/2023, CM APPL. 17251/2023 & CM APPL. 17252/2023
3. Mr. Avi Singh appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed the contempt application on 14.04.2022. Learned counsel submits that though the notice was issued, however, neither reply has been filed nor has the learned Trial Court adjudicated the said contempt application.
4. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner had also filed second contempt application on 21.01.2023, however, no notice yet on the said contempt application has been issued till date.
5. Learned counsel submits that an application under Order XV Rule 5 of CPC, 1908 was filed on 26.08.2022 seeking direction to the respondent to deposit arrears of monthly charges, which is still pending before the learned Trial Court since then.
6. Learned counsel makes a request that a direction to the learned Trial Court be issued to hear and dispose of the aforesaid applications expeditiously. Learned counsel submits that the advance copy of the present petition has already been served upon the learned counsel for respondents on 08.04.2023.
7. This Court proceeds to dispose of the instant application in accordance with Delhi High Court Circular No. 69/Rules/DHC dated 05.12.2019, which reads as under:
"5. Appearance on the first date of listing:
(a) Where a Civil Miscellaneous (Main) Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India or Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is filed, any opposite party desiring to oppose any of the prayers made in such petition or in any interim application accompanying such petition shall appear personally or through counsel to make submissions as he/she may desire before the Court.
(b) In case any opposite party does not appear before the Court upon advance service of the petition, the Court may not issue any further notice to such opposite party and may pass any order(s) as it may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
8. Since the only prayer sought by the petitioner is in respect of a direction to the learned Trial Court to hear the pending applications, notice to respondent is dispensed with.
9. It is also informed that the matter is listed for consideration before the learned Trial Court on 12.04.2023.
10. In view of the aforesaid, this court deems it fit that the learned Trial Court takes up these pending applications on 12.04.2023 or soon thereafter, accordingly to its convenience and dispose of the same one way or the other, expeditiously and any other pending applications, in accordance to the nature of its urgency.
11. The aforesaid petition is disposed off with no order as to costs.
12. Copy of this order be given dasti under the signature of Court Master.
The court has the authority to grant directions to expedite the process of hearing and disposing of pending applications in accordance with relevant court rules and circulars.
The court has the authority to direct the learned Trial Court to expedite the proceedings and dispose of pending applications within specified timelines.
The petitioner cannot be left remediless due to the non-decision on the application for stay filed in the appeal.
Contempt application - In the event of applicant making an application to expedite proceedings pending before competent court, it is expected that court shall consider and decide applicant's' applica....
Timely hearing of applications in civil proceedings is essential, with courts expected to adhere to deadlines and avoid unnecessary delays.
Payments ordered in contempt proceedings classified as costs under CPC rather than fines, raising issues of compliance and clarity in judicial orders.
The assurance of the respondents regarding the timely passing of the order influenced the court's decision in disposing of the appeal.
Misuse of contempt petitions against judicial officers and the availability of remedies such as appeals under the Judges (Protection) Act, 1985.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.