SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1552

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Nk/Ph Vineet Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
None, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Abhishek Saket, SPC with Mr. Amit Acharya, G.P. Maj. Partho Katyayan, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The petitioner in his petition has made following prayers:

a) To direct the respondents for sanctioning of the annual leave to the petitioner.

b) To direct the respondents to conclude the disciplinary proceedings in respect of the petitioner if the same is not yet completed at the earliest.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents appearing on advance notice has informed this Court that the petitioner applied for leave on 08.04.2023 and the said application is pending for consideration.

3. We hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to take decision on leave application dated 08.04.2023 within 10 days from today.

4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top