SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1279

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Havna Bhartendu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Chhavi Yadav & Mr. Ajit Kakkar, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Major Partho Katyayan, for the Army.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:

    "a.) To pass writ of Mandamus against the respondents for sanctioning of the annual leave to the petitioner;

    b.) To pass writ of Mandamus against the respondents to conclude the Disciplinary Proceedings in respect of the Petitioner if the same is not yet completed at the earliest."

2. Learned counsel for the respondents appearing on advance notice has informed this Court that the petitioner applied for leave on 18.03.2023 and the said application is still pending for consideration.

3. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to take a final decision on Leave Application dated 18.03.2023 within ten days from today.

4. The present petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top