Back
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Rajbir Pal – Appellant
Versus
Kanwar Partap Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of factual background (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against landlord's bona fide need (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. respondent's counterarguments on bona fide need (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. identification of issues before the court (Para 12) |
| 5. court's analysis on procedural requirements (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. definition and application of bona fide requirement (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. implications of tenant's alternative properties (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. final conclusion of the court's observations (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. final dismissal of the petition (Para 41) |
JUDGMENT
1. Aggrieved by the Order dated 26.08.2021, passed by the ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC, North District, Rohini, Delhi in Eviction Petition bearing R.C. No. 37/2018, whereby the Eviction Petition of the Respondent herein was allowed and the Leave to Defend application of the Petitioners herein was dismissed, the instant revision petition has been filed under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the "DRC Act).
2. The facts, in brief, leading to the instant petition are as under:
a) It is stated that Property No. 82, Village Rajpura, Gur Mandi, Delhi -11000
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
