Back
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
In the Matter of: Rajbir Pal – Appellant
Versus
Kanwar Partap Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition against eviction order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenging the legitimacy of eviction. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. jurisdictional issues regarding eviction procedures. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. concealment of material facts by landlord. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. analysis of bona fide needs under proposed eviction terms. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. historical legislative perspective on eviction requests. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. impact of alternate accommodation on eviction claims. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 8. interpretations and rulings on section 14(1) of drc act. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 9. dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 41) |
JUDGMENT :
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Aggrieved by the Order dated 26.08.2021., passed by the ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC, North District, Rohini, Delhi in Eviction Petition bearing R.C. No. 37/2018, whereby the Eviction Petition of the Respondent herein was allowed and the Leave to Defend application of the Petitioners herein was dismissed, the instant revision petition has been filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the “DRC Act).
2. The facts, in brief, leading to the instant petition are as under:
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
