SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1322

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Sarbraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava & Mr. Satyarth S, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Jitesh Vikram Shrivastava, SPC with Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, GP, for the Respondent.

ORDER

CM APPL. 21412/2023

1. The petitioner in his application has made following prayer:

    a) Allow the instant application and close the right of the respondents to file a counter-affidavit to the CM APPL. 11477/2023.

2. Vide Order dated 20.03.2023, the respondents were directed to file counter affidavit within six weeks. However, till date, the same has not been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, has assured this Court that the counter affidavit is almost ready and will be filed within three weeks.

4. In view of the assurance made by the learned counsel for the respondents, the application is disposed of.

5. However, it is made clear that if the counter affidavit is not filed within three weeks, the same shall be accepted with a cost of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited in Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee.

CM APPL. 11477/2023

6. Learned counsel for the respondents seeks time and granted three weeks time to file the reply.

W.P.(C) 2942/2023

7. List before the Registrar on 07.07.2023, the date already fixed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top