Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, MANOJ JAIN
Amit Jain – Appellant
Versus
Canara Bank – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Vide the present appeal, the appellant is seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 10.11.2022 passed by learned Single Judge in I.A. No.15745/2022 and I.A. No.16168/2022.
2. Appellant is further seeking setting aside of cost of Rs.1 lac imposed upon him vide the aforesaid order dated 10.11.2022.
3. Learned counsel for appellant submits that he presses this appeal qua prayer for setting aside impugned order dated 10.11.2022 only to the extent whereby cost of Rs.1 lac was imposed upon the appellant.
4. In para 15 of order dated 23.09.2022, it was recorded that counsel for the plaintiff therein submitted that advance copy had been served upon the counsel appearing on behalf of defendant No.1-Bank in the W.P.(C) 13448/2022 as well as on his email-id of the Bank.
5. Learned counsel for respondent No.1/Bank does not dispute the same and submits the copy of notice was served upon email-id of the Bank.
6. In view of submission of learned counsel for respondent No.1, as admitted by him that copy of notice was duly served upon the respondent No.1-Bank, there was no occasion to impose the cost upon the appellant while passing the impugned order.
7. According
The legal principle established in the judgment emphasizes the importance of valid service of notice and the lack of valid reason for imposing costs.
The court established that costs can be contested separately from the merits of a case, and that prior rulings can influence decisions on cost impositions.
The court established that costs imposed in Writ proceedings can be contested and modified based on the circumstances and agreements of the parties involved.
Court affirmed the lower court's decision and dismissed the appeal, stating no interference was necessary.
The court maintains discretion in imposing costs in setting aside ex parte judgments, with considerations for delay and securing decree amounts clarified.
Judicial discretion in setting costs must be reasonable and not impose undue hardship on a debtor.
A court's discretion to award costs must be based on clear justification; costs awarded without reasons are unsustainable.
The court established that costs imposed by a Tribunal can be reviewed and set aside if compliance with the Tribunal's orders is demonstrated and the affected party does not insist on the payment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
