SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4577

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Surender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 16373 of 2022 & CM APPL. 51390 of 2022, 19933 of 2023 & 19936 of 2023
Decided On : 17-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Mr. Anshuman Mehrotra, Mr. Nikunj Arora and Ms. Samridhi Bhatt, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Pratima N. Lakra, CGSC with Ms. Vanya Bajaj, Advocate, for the Respondent-1 to 4.
Ms. Somyashree, Advocate, for the Respondent-5.

The court upheld the petitioner's request for a writ of certiorari to quash specified orders and directed a fresh inquiry by the ICC, ensuring the petitioner's rights under the relevant rules.

Headnote:

Writ of Certiorari - Quashing of Orders - Fresh Inquiry by ICC

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash several orders related to the inquiry into allegations of sexual harassment, and also requested a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to conduct a fresh inquiry in strict terms of relevant rules and laws.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition by setting aside the specified orders and directing the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) to start a fresh inquiry against the petitioner, providing the petitioner with the opportunity to participate in the proceedings.

Issues: Quashing of orders related to the inquiry process, direction for a fresh inquiry by ICC

Ratio Decidendi: The court found in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the specified orders and directing a fresh inquiry by the ICC, ensuring the petitioner's rights as provided under relevant rules.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition by setting aside the specified orders and directing the ICC to start a fresh inquiry against the petitioner, ensuring the petitioner's rights under the relevant rules.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioner prays as under:

    "I. Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing of the order dated 21.10.2022 whereby the Internal Complaints Committee was constituted to inquire into the allegations of sexual harassment, any such orders passed in furtherance thereof including the ones that has not even been communicated, order dated 03.11.2022 whereby the Respondents have rejected the representation of the Petitioner, signal dated 03.11.2022 whereby the Respondents have proceeded ahead with the first stage of the inquiry process, order dated 16.11.2022 whereby the Respondents have suspended the Petitioner on ground of contemplated/pending inquiry and of the Standing Order 02/2017 issued by the Respondents to the extent whereby it contravenes the already established statute, being the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 as well as Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act & Rules.

    II. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to conduct the inquiry, if need be, in strict terms of Rule 14 (2) of the CCS (CCA) Rules and the relevant provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act & Rules, independent and free from any kind of biasness as well as in conformity with the observations made by this Hon'ble Court on 29.05.2009 in W.P.(C) No. 8226/2007 titled as Prof. Bidyug Chakraborty vs. Delhi University and Ors. and 05.09.2016 in W.P.(C) No. 453/2015 titled as Union of India and Anr. vs. S.K. Das."

2. Affidavit filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 pursuant to order dated 16.02.2023 is on record.

3. After hearing learned counsel for parties, it is agreed by learned counsel for petitioner on instructions that the present petition may be disposed of, if order dated 02.02.2023, report of Inquiry Officer dated 21.10.2022 and charge-sheet dated 02.02.2023 are set aside and ICC may start fresh inquiry/proceedings against the petitioner, as per the law by giving him an opportunity to participate in the said proceedings.

4. Learned CGSC for respondents does not dispute the same.

5. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of present petition by setting aside the order dated 02.02.2023, report of Inquiry Officer dated 21.10.2022 and charge-sheet dated 02.02.2023 and giving liberty that ICC shall start fresh inquiry against the petitioner, as per law by giving him opportunity to participate in the said proceedings.

6. Needless to say, petitioner shall be entitled to all his rights as provided under Rule 14(2) of Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules 1965.

7. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top