IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Surender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 16373 of 2022 & CM APPL. 51390 of 2022, 19933 of 2023 & 19936 of 2023
Decided On : 17-05-2023
Writ of Certiorari - Quashing of Orders - Fresh Inquiry by ICC
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash several orders related to the inquiry into allegations of sexual harassment, and also requested a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to conduct a fresh inquiry in strict terms of relevant rules and laws.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the petition by setting aside the specified orders and directing the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) to start a fresh inquiry against the petitioner, providing the petitioner with the opportunity to participate in the proceedings.
Issues: Quashing of orders related to the inquiry process, direction for a fresh inquiry by ICC
Ratio Decidendi: The court found in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the specified orders and directing a fresh inquiry by the ICC, ensuring the petitioner's rights as provided under relevant rules.
Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition by setting aside the specified orders and directing the ICC to start a fresh inquiry against the petitioner, ensuring the petitioner's rights under the relevant rules.
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Vide the present petition, petitioner prays as under:
"I. Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing of the order dated 21.10.2022 whereby the Internal Complaints Committee was constituted to inquire into the allegations of sexual harassment, any such orders passed in furtherance thereof including the ones that has not even been communicated, order dated 03.11.2022 whereby the Respondents have rejected the representation of the Petitioner, signal dated 03.11.2022 whereby the Respondents have proceeded ahead with the first stage of the inquiry process, order dated 16.11.2022 whereby the Respondents have suspended the Petitioner on ground of contemplated/pending inquiry and of the Standing Order 02/2017 issued by the Respondents to the extent whereby it contravenes the already established statute, being the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 as well as Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act & Rules.
II. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to conduct the inquiry, if need be, in strict terms of Rule 14 (2) of the CCS (CCA) Rules and the relevant provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act & Rules, independent and free from any kind of biasness as well as in conformity with the observations made by this Hon'ble Court on 29.05.2009 in W.P.(C) No. 8226/2007 titled as Prof. Bidyug Chakraborty vs. Delhi University and Ors. and 05.09.2016 in W.P.(C) No. 453/2015 titled as Union of India and Anr. vs. S.K. Das."
2. Affidavit filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 4 pursuant to order dated 16.02.2023 is on record.
3. After hearing learned counsel for parties, it is agreed by learned counsel for petitioner on instructions that the present petition may be disposed of, if order dated 02.02.2023, report of Inquiry Officer dated 21.10.2022 and charge-sheet dated 02.02.2023 are set aside and ICC may start fresh inquiry/proceedings against the petitioner, as per the law by giving him an opportunity to participate in the said proceedings.
4. Learned CGSC for respondents does not dispute the same.
5. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of present petition by setting aside the order dated 02.02.2023, report of Inquiry Officer dated 21.10.2022 and charge-sheet dated 02.02.2023 and giving liberty that ICC shall start fresh inquiry against the petitioner, as per law by giving him opportunity to participate in the said proceedings.
6. Needless to say, petitioner shall be entitled to all his rights as provided under Rule 14(2) of Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules 1965.
7. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
The court upheld the petitioner's request for a writ of certiorari to quash specified orders and directed a fresh inquiry by the ICC, ensuring the petitioner's rights under the relevant rules.
Inquiries under the Sexual Harassment Act must be conducted where witnesses reside to ensure fairness, and parties must exhaust appellate remedies before seeking judicial review.
Fairness and compliance with statutory provisions are essential in the inquiry process under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, mandating prompt decisions on representations.
The main legal point established is that the Presiding Officer of the Internal Complaints Committee must be a higher level woman officer in accordance with Section 4(2)(a) of the Sexual Harassment of....
The court affirmed the necessity of adhering to the principles of natural justice in disciplinary inquiries related to sexual harassment.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of complying with the statutory provisions and principles of natural justice in cases of alleged sexual harassment at the workpla....
An Internal Complaints Committee under the POSH Act must be constituted to maintain impartiality and avoid conflict of interest, ensuring that the presiding officer and members meet the requisite sen....
The Internal Complaints Committee lacks jurisdiction under the Sexual Harassment Act when allegations do not qualify as sexual harassment within its definition.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.