SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4148

JYOTI SINGH
Santosh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Anil Agarwal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Nischay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rit Arora, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 11962/2022 (delay of 10 days in filing the petition)

1. Present application has been preferred seeking condonation of delay of 10 days in filing the revision petition.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

3. Delay of 10 days in filing the revision petition is condoned.

4. Application stands disposed of.

C.R.P. 28/2022, CM APPL. 11960/2022 (direction)

5. Present revision petition has been filed laying a challenge to the impugned order dated 23.11.2021 passed by the Trial Court whereby an application filed by the Petitioner herein under Order XII Rule 6 CPC has been dismissed. Petitioner herein is the Plaintiff before the Trial Court and Respondent is the sole Defendant and the parties are hereinafter referred to by their litigating status before the Trial Court.

6. Facts being in a narrow compass for the purpose of adjudicating this revision petition and as averred in the petition are that Plaintiff's mother late Smt. Bhagwati Devi was the absolute owner of built-up property bearing No. B-7/C-58, ad-measuring 220 Sq. Yards in Khasra No. 1422, now bearing the new No. B-7/C-58, Sharda Puri, New Delhi-15 (hereina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top