Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Rohit Singh Rathore – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
CM APPL.29043/2023 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 7476/2023 & CM APPL. 29042/2023
3. By way of the present petition, petitioners pray as under:
a. To quash and set aside impugned order No.I.2101/28/2022 (E- 13229)/Estt-2298 dated 24.02.2023 as unconstitutional and ultra vires the ITBP Act & Rules;
b. To quash and set aside order No.I-21017/28/Afghanistan/2022/Estt- 8701-99 dated 27.02.2023 and direct the respondents to draw a fresh list of empaneled personnel on the basis of Standing Order No.04/2017 as it stood prior to amendment dated 24.02.2023.
4. The case of petitioners is that respondents ITBP had issued signal dated 11.07.2022 calling nominations from eligible ITBP personnel for preparation of panel for deputation to Indian Mission Afghanistan in terms of Standing Order No.04/2017. The petitioners applied and after going through the pre-selection training and final test, they were declared successful in terms of the Standing Order No.04/2017. The petitioners were hopeful of securing high rank in the final merit list of declared successful candidates. However, respondents in an irrational an
The court upheld the principle that amendments affecting criteria for deputation should not be applied retroactively and should not unfairly affect the rights of candidates who had already qualified ....
The court upheld the discretion of administrative bodies in selection processes, emphasizing that personnel do not have a fundamental right to claim deputation but a right to fair consideration based....
Deployment decisions are administrative and within the discretion of the competent authorities, but must be made in accordance with relevant policies and without discrimination.
The Standing Order No. 1 of 2009 provides a framework for determining the seniority of Assistant Commandants in the C.R.P.F., particularly for those who are unable to complete training due to medical....
The court established that procedural irregularities in promotion processes warrant correction, emphasizing the responsibility of authorities to ensure fairness in selection.
Waiting list candidate entitled to appointment for vacancy arising during validity period despite expiry plea, especially with judicial post reservation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
