Back
V. KAMESWAR RAO, SAURABH BANERJEE
Rohit Singh Rathore – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed by itbp personnel. (Para 1) |
| 2. claim of unfair selection criteria and transparency issues. (Para 2 , 9 , 10 , 22 , 33) |
| 3. guidelines and standing orders affecting selection criteria. (Para 3 , 4 , 14 , 19) |
| 4. explanation of selection processes and criteria by itbp. (Para 5) |
| 5. selection process involved pre-selection training. (Para 6 , 7 , 38) |
| 6. no constitutional rights violated in the amendment. (Para 8 , 12 , 23 , 42) |
| 7. amendments made to boost morale and address grievances. (Para 15 , 44 , 49 , 50) |
| 8. legal argument against retrospective application of selection criteria. (Para 20 , 21 , 25) |
| 9. writ petition dismissed as no rights infringed. (Para 26 , 27 , 56 , 60) |
| 10. discussion on public interest and selection criteria. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 11. final ruling on the legality of the amendment. (Para 52 , 54) |
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J.
1. The present petition has been filed by 44 petitioners, who are serving personnel of the Indo Tibetan Border Police (`ITBP', for short)/respondents, with the following prayers:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to issue directions or writ more than one in nature inclu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
