SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5226

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Sanjay – Appellant
Versus
State & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 6775 of 2022 & Cr.M.C. 74 of 2023, Cr.M.A. 263 of 2023
Decided On : 02-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Ms.Tanya Agrawal, Mr.Ajay Singh and Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Advocates with petitioner in person in CRL.M.C. 6775/2022.
Mr.Hemant Mehla, APP, for the state with Mr.Dipanshu Meena, Advocate, for the Respondent. ASI Manvir Singh, PS Gokalpuri in CRL.M.C. 6775/2022 and CRL.M.C. 74/2023, CRL.M.A. 263/2023.
Mr.Zeeshan Diwan, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr.Rishabh Tehlan, Advocate, for R-2 with Respondent No.2 in person in CRL.M.C. 6775/2022.
Mr.Zeeshan Diwan, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr.Rishabh Tehlan, Advocate with Petitioner in person in CRL.M.C. 74/2023, CRL.M.A. 263/2023.
Ms.Tanya Agrawal, Mr.Ajay Singh and Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Advocates, for R-2 with Respondent No.2 in person in CRL.M.C. 74/2023, CRL.M.A. 263/2023.

The court can quash FIRs based on an amicable settlement between the parties, especially when the dispute is of a private nature and the parties express no objection to the quashing.

Headnote:

Settlement - Dispute over bursting crackers on Diwali - Quashing of FIRs

Fact of the Case:

The dispute arose due to bursting of crackers on Diwali which led to an altercation between the parties. Both parties, who are neighbors and belong to economically weaker strata of society, had levelled counter allegations of hitting each other with a lathi. The parties later settled all their disputes amicably through a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and expressed no objection to quashing the FIRs.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the private nature of the dispute, the simple nature of injuries, and the amicable settlement between the parties. It concluded that putting an end to the dispute in the interest of justice was appropriate, especially considering the parties' reluctance to pursue the complaints due to the settlement.

Issues: Quashing of FIRs under sections 308/34 IPC and section 308 IPC, based on the settlement between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the private nature of the dispute, the amicable settlement between the parties, the simple nature of injuries, and the parties' reluctance to pursue the complaints due to the settlement.

Final Decision: The court quashed FIR No. 609/2017 and FIR No. 608/2017, along with all other proceedings emanating therefrom, based on the amicable settlement between the parties.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

1. These are two petitions seeking quashing of cross FIR No. 609/2017 registered under sections 308/34 IPC and FIR No. 608/2017 registered under section 308, IPC. FIR No. 609/2017 was lodged on the complaint of respondent No. 2 in CRL.M.C. 6775/2022 namely Bijender and FIR No. 608/2017 was lodged on the complaint of respondent No. 2 in CRL.M.C. 74/2023 namely Sanjay. Both the FIRs were lodged on 20.10.2017 at PS Gokalpuri.

2. As per both FIRs the dispute arose due to bursting of crackers on Diwali which led to an altercation between the parties. Both the petitioners namely Sanjay and Bijender are labourers and had levelled counter allegations of hitting each other with a lathi.

3. Ld. Counsel submits that the petitioners are neighbours residing in the slums at Sanjay Colony in Gokalpuri and belong to economically weaker strata of society. Ld. counsel submits that while the proceedings were underway, with the intervention of well-wishers and family members, both the parties amicably settled all their disputes vide MoU dated 21.09.2022 on the following terms and conditions:

    "AND WHEREAS both the parties have compromised the matter with the intervention of respectable persons and both the parties have settled all their disputes which arisen between them amicably with their own free will, without any undue pressure, force, coercion.

    AND WHEREAS both the parties undertakes not to interfere in the peaceful life of each other.

    As per the compromise the first party will assist the second party in quashing/compounding the above said FIR No. 609/2017, u/s 308/323/341/34 IPC at P.S. Gokul Puri, Delhi.

    As per the compromise the Second party will assist the first party in quashing/compounding the above said FIR No. 608/2017, U/S 308 IPC at P.S. Gokul Puri, Delhi at P.S. Gokul Puri, Delhi.

    WHEREAS both the parties upon satisfaction of aforementioned terms shall have no further claims whatsoever against each other from this day onwards and terms of the aforementioned deed is binding upon them and also both the parties further undertakes that they will not violate the conditions of the compromise and settlement deed executed by them.

    WHEREAS both the parties aver that the aforesaid statements and contents are true to their knowledge and nothing material is concealed there from and there is no collusion whatsoever between the parties and the present compromise and settlement deed has been executed with free will and consent and without any coercion, undue duress, influence or threat from any body and without being influenced by each other."

4. The parties are present in person and have been duly identified by the IO. The parties state that the present dispute arose out of a misunderstanding over the issue of bursting crackers on the day of Diwali which eventually led to an altercation. The parties state that they have amicably settled all their disputes and grievances vide MoU dated 21.09.2022 and do not wish to pursue the present complaints any further. The parties state that they are neighbours to each other and resolve to live peacefully in the future. The parties state that they have no objection if the present FIRs and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. The parties state that they are making the statement voluntarily against all claims (past, present and future) without any fear, force, undue influence or coercion. An affidavit of no objection has also been filed on behalf of both the complainants along with the present petitions.

5. Learned Addl. P.P. for the State submits that in the present matter the injuries sustained were simple in nature. Ld. APP submits that as per the Investigating Officer, there is no other dispute between the parties. It has been further submitted that the petitioners do not have any past criminal antecedents.

6. I have considered the submissions. The parties are neighbours. The incident happened on the day of Diwali. The injuries were stated to be simp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top