IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Images Consumer Media Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Horse Shoe Retail Holding Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
CO.PET. 418 of 2016 & CO.APPL. 377 of 2023
Decided On : 03-07-2023
Dissolution - Companies Act, 1956 - Section 481, Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - The court ordered the dissolution of the company based on the Official Liquidator's application under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Fact of the Case:
The Official Liquidator filed an application seeking dissolution of the company, citing lack of immovable assets and only some movable items which were sold at a nominal amount.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the company had no significant assets and that the winding up proceedings should be brought to an end, leading to the dissolution of the company.
Issues: The main issue was the lack of assets and the need for dissolution under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Meghal Homes (P) Ltd. v. Shree Niwas Ginni K.K. Samiti & Ors., (2007) 7 SCC 753 to order the dissolution of the company.
Final Decision: The court allowed the Official Liquidator's application and ordered the dissolution of the company, permitting the closure of the books of account and discharging the Official Liquidator.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CO.APPL.377/2023 in CO.PET.418/2016
2. This is an application filed by the Official Liquidator seeking dissolution of the company. Ms. Sangeeta, ld. Counsel for the Official Liquidator submits that none of the immovable assets of the company - Horse Shoe Retail Holding (P) Ltd. and its sister concern SPA Luxury Lifestyle Ltd. were in the name of the company and the only assets, which the company owned, were some movable items, which were also sold in the nominal amount.
3. This application has been filed by the Official Liquidator (OL) under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, praying that Company (in Liqn.) i.e., the Respondent - Horse Shoe Retail Holding Pvt. Ltd. be dissolved and the OL be discharged from the duties of a liquidator.
4. Vide order dated 4th October, 2018, the OL attached to this Court was appointed as the Provisional Liquidator of the Company, with directions to take charge of all assets, records and books of accounts belonging to the Company (in Liqn.). The citations were published on 4th July, 2019 in the newspapers "Statesman" (English) and "Veer Arjun" (Hindi). Subsequently, vide order dated 2nd December, 2019, the Company (in Liqn.) has been finally wound up. The publication of citation for final winding up of the Company (in Liqn.) has been dispensed with vide order dated 15th May, 2023 in CA No. 302/2023.
5. It is stated in the application that as per the records of the Company (in Liqn.) kept at the office of the Registrar of Companies, Delhi and Haryana (ROC) and Master Data available on MCA portal, there were two Directors namely, Mr. Narendra Singh Bisht and Mr. Rajpal Singh Bisht. Both the Directors have filed their statement under Rule 130 and Statement of Affairs (SOA) has been filed only by Mr. Narendra Singh Bisht on 10th May,2019.
6. It is stated that the registered office of the Company (in Liqn.) is situated at 2822/18, Bedanpura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005. The same was not sealed by the team from the office of the OL on its visit to the registered office on 12th January, 2019, for taking over the possession of assets and records/books of accounts, as the team was informed that the registered office was never let out/sold to the Company or its Directors; that there was an existing Sale Deed which was shown to the team and as the team did not find any sign board of the Company (in Liqn.) at the site.
7. The application points out that vide letter dated 21st February, 2019 received from Mr. Narendra Singh Bisht, Ex-Director it was informed that inventories/moveable assets (branded crockery items) of the Company (in Liqn.) as well as its sister concern namely, SPA Luxury Lifestyle Ltd. were lying at Room No. 01, First Floor, Khasra No 504, next to NDMC Girls School Rajokri, New Delhi-110038.
8. The team from the office of the OL visited the said address on 22nd February, 2019. After taking photographs of the premises and preparing a list of inventory of the articles lying therein along with a video of the inventory lying, the team sealed the main gate along with the lift which was installed adjacent to the room/hall where the inventory/moveable assets were kept.
9. This Hon'ble Court vide order dated 21st May, 2019 appointed Mr. Ankit Goel as the valuer for valuation of the moveable assets of the Company (in Liqn.) and its sister concern. The Valuation Report was submitted on 16th August, 2019 in a sealed cover. A combined Sale Notice for the said moveable assets was published in the newspapers on 27th January, 2020 and 28th January, 2020 respectively. Despite five prospective buyers having visited for inspection, no bids were received.
10. It is stated that while allowing CA No. 227/2022 permission was granted to appoint a fresh Valuer to revalue the moveable assets of the Company (in Liqn.). The goods were revalued and a combined hand bil
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the court to order the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 when the winding up proceedings ar....
The lack of assets for realization in the interest of the creditors can be a ground for ordering the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Court to order the dissolution of a company when the Official Liquidator is unable to realize any assets to pay off the com....
The court can order the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 when the Official Liquidator cannot proceed with the winding up of the company due to lack of funds or as....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the dissolution of a company in liquidation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing for the dissolution of a company when the affairs have been ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, a company can be dissolved when the affairs of the company have been completely wound up or when....
The lack of funds and assets to proceed with the winding up proceedings justifies the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
The court can order the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, when the affairs of the company have been completely wound up or the Official Liquidator cannot proceed ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.