IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Delfin Expo Mart – Appellant
Versus
Royal Regency Fassions Pvt. Ltd. & Others – Respondent
CO.PET. 190 of 2013 & CO.APPL. 343 of 2023
Decided On : 05-07-2023
Companies Act, 1956 - Dissolution of Company - Official Liquidator unable to realize any assets - Company ordered to be dissolved
Fact of the Case:
The Official Liquidator moved an application seeking dissolution of the Company (In Liqdn.) under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, as he was unable to realize any assets of the company to pay off its creditors.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the Official Liquidator was unable to make any appropriate seizure or realization of funds to pay off any prospective creditor of the Company (In Liqdn.) as there were no immoveable assets, moveable assets, or cash available. The Court allowed the application and ordered the dissolution of the company, exempting the official liquidator from inviting claims from the creditors.
Issues: Inability of the Official Liquidator to realize any assets of the company, resulting in the application for dissolution of the company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the Official Liquidator's inability to realize any assets of the company, which led to the conclusion that no purpose would be served in inviting claims from the creditors and to keep the proceedings alive.
Final Decision: The Court ordered the dissolution of the Company (In Liqdn.) and discharged the Official Liquidator, exempting the official liquidator from inviting claims from the creditors.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CO.APPL.343/2023 in CO.PET.190/2013
2. The present application has been moved by the Official Liquidator (OL) under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking dissolution of the Company (In Liqdn.), namely, M/s Royal Regency Fassions Pvt. Ltd., which was directed to be taken over by the Official Liquidator attached to this Hon'ble Court as its Provisional Liquidator on 30th July, 2014.
3. Mr. Bhattacharya, ld. counsel for the Official Liquidator has made his submissions in the application.
4. The Ld. Counsel for the Official Liquidator, Mr. D. Bhattacharya, submits that the Official Liquidator has moved this application as ultimately he could not lay his hands on any asset which could be liquidated nor could make any realization thereof. He states that post the appointment of the official liquidator by this Hon'ble Court, though certain seizures were made, like the registered office of the Company (In Liqdn.), but later it was found to be not belonging to the Company (In Liqdn.) and rather that property was the personal asset of the Ex-Directors, and which again was mortgaged to Bank of Baroda. Later, Bank of Baroda had seized the same under SARFAESI proceedings and disposed it off on 1st March, 2014 vide a registered sale deed. Accordingly, the Company (in liqdn.) was not found to be owning any immoveable property.
5. The Ld. Counsel further submits that as regards other assets, there were certain moveables like furniture & fittings & stock, and some trade debtors and loans and advances. The Furniture & fittings were stated by the ex-directors to be taken over by the Bank of Baroda. As regards the trade debtors and loan and advances, the value specified were Rs.82,00,000/- (Approx.), as per the value specified in the statement of affairs dt. 30.07.2014. However, none of them were found to be realizable because when notices were issued to those debtors, all such notices have returned unserved.
6. Further, the Ld. Counsel submits that in these circumstances the Official Liquidator cannot proceed further; he is not left with any asset of the Company (In Liqdn), he has no funds to disburse to Creditors of the Company (In Liqdn.) even if any claims might exist against the Company (In Liqdn.). Accordingly, it is submitted by the Ld. Counsel that no purpose will be served in inviting any claims from the creditors of the Company (In Liqdn.) and to keep the present proceedings alive. As such, the Ld. Counsel prays to allow the present application stating it to be a fit case to order dissolution of the Company (In Liqdn.).
7. Heard the Ld. Counsel.
8. The submissions made herein above demonstrate that the Official Liquidator is unable to make any appropriate seizure or make any realization of funds which he could have utilized to pay off any prospective creditor of the Company (In Liqdn.). Neither are there any immoveable assets nor any moveable asset or cash available in the hands of the Official Liquidator. In the circumstances, this Hon'ble Court is of the view that the present application deserves to be allowed, and is allowed with the following directions:
i. That since no assets are available, the official liquidator is exempted from inviting claims from the creditors;
ii. That M/s Royal Regency Fassions Pvt. Ltd., the Company (In Liqdn.) is ordered to be dissolved hereby, and the Official Liquidator stands discharged accordingly.
9. The Official Liquidator will intimate the concerned Registrar-of-Companies about the present order passed by this Hon'ble Court in not later than 30 days hereof.
10. With the above directions, this present petition along with all pending applications is disposed of.
11. Next date of hearing stands cancelled.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Court to order the dissolution of a company when the Official Liquidator is unable to realize any assets to pay off the com....
The court can order the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 when the Official Liquidator cannot proceed with the winding up of the company due to lack of funds or as....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the court to order the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 when the winding up proceedings ar....
The lack of assets for realization in the interest of the creditors can be a ground for ordering the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the court to dissolve a company when its affairs have been completely wound up or when the Official Liquidator cannot proceed w....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the dissolution of a company in liquidation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, a company can be dissolved when the affairs of the company have been completely wound up or when....
The court can order the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, when the affairs of the company have been completely wound up or the Official Liquidator cannot proceed ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing for the dissolution of a company when the affairs have been ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.