IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Geeta & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State & Ors. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 5485 of 2022 & Cr.M.C. 5573 of 2022
Decided On : 24-08-2023
Quashing of FIR - Settlement Deed - The court exercised its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the FIRs as the parties had reached a settlement, and continuing with the proceedings would serve no purpose in light of the amicable settlement.
Fact of the Case:
The petitions were filed to quash FIRs lodged due to quarrels and physical altercations between the parties. However, the parties reached a settlement deed, resolving their disputes amicably.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the settlement deed would bring peace and cordial relations between the parties, and continuing with the proceedings would serve no purpose. The court exercised its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the FIRs and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.
Issues: The issues involved the quashing of FIRs under Section 482 Cr.P.C, considering the settlement reached by the parties and the purpose of continuing with the criminal prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the settlement reached by the parties, the intention to bring peace and better relations, and the exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C to prevent the abuse of the process of court and secure the ends of justice.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIRs and all other proceedings emanating therefrom, as the parties had amicably settled the matter.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present petitions have been filed under section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing FIR No. 324/2022 and under sections 307/323/324/34 IPC at P.S Wazirabad, North Delhi and for quashing FIR No. 325/2022 under section 323/307/34 IPC at P.S Wazirabad, North Delhi.
2. FIR No. 324/2022 was lodged on the statement of Binami alleging therein that his family had a quarrel with the family residing on the same floor as the complainant. The petitioner/Geeta was loudly abusing someone on the phone. On being asked, she picked up a brick and injured the son of the complainant. She also threatened to kill other family members and attacked the complainant's family with knives.
3. FIR No. 325/2022 was lodged by Geeta Kumari alleging therein that the accused who is residing on the same floor as the complainant was telling someone that we had a fight with neighbours and we would shoot them. On being asked, the accused started scuffling and thrashing the complainant and her sister.
4. However, the parties have now reached a settlement deed dated: 10.10.2022 on the following terms and conditions:
"1. That the disputes and differences between both the parties have been settled amicably. Now, the second party left with no grievances against the first party in any manner whatsoever.
2. That it has been agreed between the parties that the second party shall compound the offences contained in the above FIR, which has been lodged against the first party and shall cooperate with the first party in getting quashed the above case FIR from the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi.
3. That both the parties have arrived on this settlement amicably and voluntarily, without any kind of threat, influence, coercion, pressure, force or fraud from any corner whatsoever.
4. That the contents of this deed have been read over and explained to both the parties in their vernacular language and they have understood the same and admitted the same as true and correct."
5. Learned counsel for the parties submits that both the parties are neighbours and belong to the lower strata of society. Learned counsel for the party submits that the quarrel took place on a very trivial issue which is now being settled.
6. Learned Additional PP has opposed the quashing petition on the ground that the offence is under Section 307 IPC repeatedly been held harmony of the society and even for 307 there has been intention of the or the circumstances while committing the act which would have caused death.
7. I consider that the settlement will bring peace in the society and cordial relations between the parties.
8. IO is present in the court today and has duly identified the parties.
9. Section 482 Cr.P.C. pre-supposes three circumstances under which the inherent jurisdiction may be exercised, i.e., (i) to give effect to an order (ii) to prevent the abuse of the process of court and (iii) to otherwise secure the ends of justice. The court while exercising the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. does not function as a court of appeal or revision. The powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., are of wide plenitude but have to be exercised sparingly with caution and only in the event when aforesaid three conditions are satisfied. The object behind the exercise of such power should be to do real and substantial justice for the administration of which the courts exist.
10. Since the parties have reached a settlement, it has been repeatedly held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and this court that when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and, therefore, no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a criminal prosecution to continue, and where the court may be of the opinion that a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations between them, the court may exercise power under section 482 CrPC for quashing the proceedings or the complaint or the FIR as the case may be.
11. IO shall also ensure that the same are taken care of properly.
12. I consider th
The court may exercise power under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash criminal proceedings when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak, and a settlement between the parties would lead to better rel....
The court may exercise its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings when a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations and no useful purpose would be served by ....
The court can quash proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C if an amicable settlement is reached and continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.
The court has the power under section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings when a settlement between parties would lead to better relations and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a crim....
The court may quash criminal proceedings under section 482 CrPC when the chances of conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing the prosecution to continue.
The power to quash criminal proceedings based on a settlement between the parties depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, and the court must consider the nature and gravity of the crime,....
The court may exercise power under section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings when the chances of ultimate conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that heinous and serious offences, especially those under Section 376 IPC, cannot be quashed based on a settlement between the parties, as they hav....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings if the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, and continuation of the case would be an abuse ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.