SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4717

MINI PUSHKARNA
Pawan Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
Vineet Arora – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sumit Sarna, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr. Pramod Kumar Ahuja, Advocate, for the Respondent-1 along with Respondent-1 in Person.

JUDGMENT

Mini Pushkarna, J.

CM APPL. 9468/2014 (under Order XLI Rule 27 read with Section 151 CPC for permission to produce additional documents)

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the appellant seeking permission to produce additional documents.

2. It is the case on behalf of the appellant that he has suffered huge financial losses due to the inaction of the respondent no. 1 in not completing the sale transaction pursuant to Agreement to Sell and Purchase between the appellant and respondent no. 1 herein. Therefore, by way of the present application, fresh documents in that regard are sought to be placed on record.

3. An Agreement to Sell and Purchase dated 26.03.2005 was entered between the appellant and respondent no. 1 wherein respondent no. 1 agreed to purchase basement and ground floor without terrace/roof rights of property no. D-6, Ranjit Nagar, Commercial Complex, New Delhi-110008, for total consideration of Rs.17,50,000/- that was to be paid on or before 23.07.2005. An amount of Rs.4,00,000/- was paid by respondent no. 1/plaintiff towards earnest money.

4. It is the case on behalf of the appellant that the execution of the documents for sale of the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top