SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 839

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Mohd. Naseem – Appellant
Versus
Moizuddn – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Mohd. Faisal, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Poonam and Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocates, for the Respondent-1.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. The present revision petition has been filed by the Petitioner (`tenant') assailing the eviction order dated 31.08.2022 passed by the ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (`Trial Court') in RC ARC No. 78246/2016, wherein, post-trial, the eviction order has been passed in favour of the Respondent No.1 (`landlord').

2. The Petitioner is seeking to challenge the impugned eviction order mainly on the ground that the Respondent No.1 has failed to prove his bona fide need as well as the fact that the said Respondent has various other suitable alternate accommodations available for his alleged bona fide need.

3. The Respondent No.1 is the co-owner of the Property bearing Nos. 673 to 677, Bazar Chitli Qabar, Jama Masjid, Delhi (`subject property'), which was jointly purchased by the Respondent No.1 along with his two brothers namely Qutubuddin i.e., Respondent No.2 herein and Qayamuddin, vide registered sale deed dated 20.09.1973. The four (4) shops at the ground floor of Property bearing Nos. 673 to 676 were let out to different tenants, wherein shop No. 673 in the subject property (`tenanted premises') was let out to the Petitioner from

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top