Back
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
H. S. Bajaj – Appellant
Versus
Satish Chopra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. This petition has been filed by the Petitioners, landlords aggrieved by the order dated 22.02.2019 passed by the Rent Controller, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (`Trial Court'), whereby, the Respondent, tenant's application seeking leave to defend has been allowed (`impugned order') and the tenant has been granted liberty to file his written statement.
2. The Petitioners filed an eviction petition on the ground of bona fide requirement under Section 14 (1)(e) read with Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (`DRC Act') seeking eviction of the Respondent from Shop bearing private No. 2 at Ground Floor of Property No. 4/55, Double Storey, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi-110018 (`tenanted premises').
2.1. The Petitioners, landlords are the joint owners of Property No. 4/55, Double Storey, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi-110018 (`subject property') wherein the tenanted premises is located on the ground floor. There are eight (8) shops on the ground floor, out of which, Shop No. 7 is in possession of Petitioner No. 1 whereas, Shop No. 8 is in possession of Petitioner No. 2 and the remaining six (6) shops are let out to different tenants. It is stated th
The landlord is not required to plead the bona fide requirement of the tenanted premises in the legal notice, and there is a strong presumption in favor of the landlord's bona fide need under Section....
The Court emphasized the presumption of bona fide need in favor of the Landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, and the restrictive scope of interference by the High Court in re....
The court recognized the landlord's prerogative to determine their specific requirements and refrained from imposing directives on the landlord regarding the nature or quality of their chosen usage o....
The landlord's bona fide need and the absence of suitable alternative accommodation for the tenant are crucial factors in determining eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
The court reinforced that tenants must demonstrate bona fide issues to contest eviction based on landlord's genuine need, while the eviction process remains expedited under the summary provisions of ....
The landlord's bona fide requirement for the tenanted premises is to be judged based on preference and suitability for the intended business, and the employment status of dependent family members doe....
The main legal point established is that the landlord's bona fide need for the premises, as per Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, was proven, and the tenant's claim of availability of a....
The landlord's authorization to file an eviction petition, the bona-fide need for the tenanted shop, and the unavailability of reasonably suitable alternative accommodation were central to the court'....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the landlord's bona fide need for the tenanted premises must be objectively assessed, and the suitability of alternative accommodations must b....
Bona fide requirement of land lord - Landlord is the best Judge of his requirement and Courts have no concern to dictate to the landlord as to how and in what manner he should live.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
