Back
V. KAMESWAR RAO, ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
Naresh Kumar Sood – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J. (Oral)
CM APPLs. 31943/2023 & 31944/2023 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Applications are disposed of.
CM APPL. 31942/2023
This is an application filed by the petitioners seeking permission to file additional documents on record.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the additional documents are taken on record.
Application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 8348/2023
1. The challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated February 21, 2023, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi (`Tribunal', for short) in Original Application No.116/2019 whereby the Tribunal in paragraphs 6 to 8 has stated as under:
"6. Therefore, keeping in view the totality of the circumstances and the facts, we dispose of this O.A. with a direction to the competent authority amongst the respondents to decide the pending representations of the applicants with respect to the subject of this O.A. in accordance with rules and instructions, as expeditiously as possible, in no case later than 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case the decision has already been taken prior to this d
Timely adjudication of pending applications
The court's decision was influenced by the representation made by the petitioners and the orders of the Tribunal.
The counting of period for ACP/MACP must relate back to the date of regularization of appointment.
The appointment of the last selectee to the post shall be subject to the outcome of the Original Application.
The court directed that departmental proceedings may continue during the pendency of a writ petition in the absence of a specific stay, while mandating the exchange of concise written submissions to ....
The court has the power of judicial review in disciplinary proceedings and can set aside orders if they are not in accordance with the law.
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making on representations for promotion.
The court emphasized the importance of following the directions given by the Tribunal and the obligation of the respondents to consider the grievance as per the guidelines and in accordance with the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
