Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Omaxe Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Jaswinder Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments of the petitioner (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 3. arguments of the respondent (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 4. court's analysis of arbitration law (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 5. findings on contract breach and force majeure (Para 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77) |
| 6. determination of refunds and interest (Para 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84) |
| 7. final conclusion on the arbitral award (Para 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. The instant Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter `The Act, 1996') being aggrieved of the Award dated 20th March 2020 seeking the following reliefs:
"a. Pass an order summoning the entire original arbitral record from the Learned Sole Arbitrator in the arbitration proceedings arising out of Arbitration Petition No.17/2015 titled Jaswinder Singh & Anor. Vs. Omaxe Ltd.;
b. Pass an order thereby setting aside the impugned award dated 20.03.2020 passed in arbitration proceedings arising out of Arbitration Petition No. 17/2015 titled Jaswinder Singh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
