Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. vs State Of Goa

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 495

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMAR
Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Goa – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. R. Venkataramani, AG Mr. Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Adv. Ms. Nancy Shah, Adv. Mr. Shishir Deshpande, AOR Mr. Shreehrasha Peechara, Adv. Ms. Harshita Sharma, Adv. Mr. Deep Narayan Sarkar, Adv. Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Ms. Niyati Kohli, Adv. Ms. Sukriti Bhatnagar, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Dusaj, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Ms. Anjali C, Adv. Mr. Surendra Khot, Adv. Mr. Agni Som, Adv. Ms. Niyati Kohli, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR

JUDGMENT :

DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.

	Table of Contents
Preliminary
Relevant factual aspects and background
Arbitration proceedings and award
Challenge to the award under Section 34 of the Act
The appeal under Section 37 of the Act
Rival Submissions
Relevant Statutory provisions
The scope of challenge to an arbitral award under Section 34 and the scope of appeal under Section 37 of the Act
Questions relating to proceedings and procedure
The award relating to variable charges on use of alternate fuel
The award relating to downrating of the plant
The award relating to variable charges on 4 MW power
The award relating to netting-out principle
Interest in award
Final comments, observations, and conclusion

Preliminary

Leave granted.

2. These two appeals, preferred against the judgment and order dated 08.03.2021, as passed by the High Court of Judicature

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 495

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMARReliance Infrastructure Ltd. – AppellantVersusState Of Goa – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJAY KUMAR
Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Goa – Respondent