SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3814

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manoj Jain, J.
Mohit Nagi & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of NCT Delhi & Ors. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 5856 of 2023
Decided On : 17-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Stuti Mishra with Mr.Saksham Arora, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the State & SI Dhananjay Gupta, PS Cyber West.
Mr. Baldev Singh with Mr.Dinyemsh Thakur, Advocates, for the Respondent.

The central legal point established is the court's authority to quash an FIR and its proceedings when the parties have amicably settled their disputes through mediation, leading to a peaceful resolution.

Headnote:

Quashing of FIR - Matrimonial Dispute - The court allowed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking for quashing of FIR No. 372/2016, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, as the parties had reached a settlement through Mediation Centre and agreed to part ways in a peaceful manner.

Fact of the Case:

The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized, leading to matrimonial discord and the registration of an FIR against the petitioners. However, the parties were able to resolve their disputes through a Settlement Agreement drawn under the aegis of Delhi Mediation Centre.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the parties had amicably settled their disputes and reached a peaceful resolution, leading to the quashing of the FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom.

Issues: The issues involved the matrimonial discord between the parties, the settlement agreement, and the quashing of the FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the amicable settlement reached between the parties through mediation, the voluntary nature of the compromise, and the absence of objection from the state due to the peaceful resolution of the matrimonial disputes.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and quashed FIR No. 372/2016, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, as the matter had been amicably settled between the parties, and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case pending.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Jain, J. (Oral)--This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking for quashing of FIR No. 372/2016, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Hari Nagar and all proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Issue notice.

3. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, learned APP along with Investigating Officer SI Dhananjay Gupta, PS Cyber West appears on advance notice and accepts notice.

4. As per the facts mentioned in the present petition, the marriage between the petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 3 was solemnized on 03.11.2014 in Delhi according to Hindu rites and ceremonies. No child was born out of the said wedlock. On account of some matrimonial discord between the parties, the aforesaid FIR was registered against the petitioners.

5. However, with the intervention of well-wishers from both the sides, the parties were able to resolve their disputes in an amicable manner, and accordingly Settlement Agreement dated 09.01.2023 was drawn under the aegis of Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts. In terms of the settlement, the parties had appeared before the learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, Tis Hazari Courts, on 06.02.2023 in relation to the petition filed under Section 13 B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1954 seeking divorce by way of mutual consent and the second motion statement was recorded on 16.05.2023.

6. A copy of the Settlement Agreement dated 09.01.2023 has also been placed on record. The Court has gone through the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 09.01.2023. As per the Settlement Agreement, the respondent No.3 herein has agreed to settle all her disputes against all the alleged accused persons and petitioner no.1 has agreed to give her a total sum of Rs.12,30,000 as full and final settlement towards all her claims of permanent alimony, stridhan, maintenance, past, present and future arising.

7. Petitioners and respondent No.3 are present in person, accompanied by their respective counsel. Respondent No.3 has been identified by the Investigating Officer SI Dhananjay Gupta, PS Cyber West and by her counsel.

8. It is informed by both the sides that out of the total amount of Rs.12,30,000/-, a sum of Rs.10 lakhs has already been paid by the petitioner No.1 to respondent No.3. Today, petitioner No.1 has brought and handed over a demand draft amounting to Rs.2,30,000/- (bearing no. 609713, dated 17.07.2023 drawn on UCO Bank). It is also jointly informed by the learned counsel for petitioner no.1 and respondent no.3 that petition seeking maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C has also been withdrawn.

9. On a specific query raised by the Court, learned counsel for respondent No.3 informs that whatever cases had been filed by respondent No.3 herein have already been withdrawn including execution petition bearing Ex.No.75/2021 which was pending before Family Court, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

10. This Court has also made queries from both the sides and in particular from respondent no.3 who is present in person along with her father and when asked, she reiterated that the compromise has taken place voluntarily, without any force, pressure or coercion and she has no objection if the present FIR in question is quashed.

11. Learned APP states that in view of the fact that the case relates to matrimonial disputes between the parties and since the parties have reached a settlement through Mediation Centre and have agreed to part ways in a peaceful manner, the State has no objection to the quashing of the FIR.

12. Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the case pending. Consequently, this present petition is allowed and FIR No. 372/2016, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Hari Nagar and all proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

13. The present petition stands disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top