SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3999

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. Kameswar Rao, Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, JJ.
Sarita Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 2939 of 2023
Decided On : 18-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr.Mahindra Dubey, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Praveen Swarup and Ms.Pratishtha Majumdar, Advocates for respondents No.2 and 3.

Compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule and cannot be claimed as a matter of right. It is a means to provide relief in cases of financial crisis and is not a source of recruitment.

Headnote:

Compassionate Appointment - Government Servant - CCS Pension Rules 1972 - Disability Act, 2016 - Section 47 - Family Pension - Financial Destitution - Appointment on Compassionate Ground - Exception to General Rule - Equal Opportunity Mandate - Dependent Family Member - Financial Crisis Relief - Appointment not a Source of Recruitment

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought appointment of her son on compassionate basis after her husband, a government servant, became 100% disabled and subsequently passed away. The Tribunal rejected the claim, stating that the family was not in penury or without any means of livelihood.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the petitioner's husband had received retiral benefits and the family was not in destitution, justifying the rejection of the claim for compassionate appointment.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner's son was entitled to compassionate appointment under the CCS Pension Rules 1972 and the Disability Act, 2016, given the circumstances of the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule and cannot be claimed as a matter of right. It emphasized the need for equal opportunity in government vacancies and the humanitarian consideration for providing relief in cases of financial crisis. The Court also highlighted that appointment on compassionate grounds is not a source of recruitment but a means to enable the family of the deceased to overcome a sudden financial crisis.

Final Decision: The Court dismissed the petition, finding it lacking in merit, and no costs were awarded.

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao (Oral)

1. The challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated February 07, 2023, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (in short `Tribunal') in O.A. 1663/2021, whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the O.A. filed by the petitioner herein.

2. The claim of the petitioner before the Tribunal was for grant of appointment of her son on compassionate basis. It is conceded position that the petitioner's husband was employed as Skilled Subordinate Staff (in short `SSF') with respondent No.3. In 2016, the petitioner's husband while working with Heavy Crane Load Machine, received serious injury due to fall of heavy hammer on his head. Similarly, on April 17, 2018, he received another cut injury on his leg during his working with respondent No.3. It is also the case of the petitioner that against the doctor's advice, the petitioner's husband was given heavy duty work. He became 100% disabled. It is conceded that he had superannuated on February 28, 2019 and died on July 26, 2019.

3. The case of the respondents before the Tribunal was that the challenge in the OA was primarily for appointment of the petitioner's son on compassionate basis which was rejected vide order impugned before the Tribunal. It was also the case that the object of the Scheme is to grant appointment on compassionate ground to the dependant family member of a Government servant dying in harness or who is retired on medical grounds, thereby leaving his family in penury and without any means of livelihood. As per rules, the disabled person has to make an application in the Department for compassionate appointment of any of his permissible legal representative only till the age of 55 (or 57 for Group D employees). As per Rule 38 of the CCS Pension Rules 1972, without prior consent of the Office In-charge, the disability certificate submitted would not be taken into consideration. It was their case that the petitioner's husband neither informed the Department of any disability nor submitted any valid disability certificate within prescribed time limit. In fact, they had stated that late husband of the petitioner had not even submitted any application in the Department for appointment of his son on compassionate ground. They also stated that the petitioner is getting family pension and the family is not in penury as having received retiral benefits on superannuation of her husband. The Tribunal on analysis of facts in para No.6 onwards has stated as under:

"6.1 In the present case, it is not disputed that the total length of service of applicant's husband was 39 years since 1980 and as a regular employee his length of service was 20 years 10 months and 27 days.

6.2 It is also not disputed that as per the Disability Certificate dated 18.01.2019, applicant was 100% disabled. On the date of application for grant of compassionate appointment, the applicant has retired from service on 28.02.2019. The applicant is seeking compassionate appointment of her son on the premise that the applicant's husband had acquired the disability during his service, and therefore, entitled to protection under Section 47 of the Disability Act, 2016. In the light of aforesaid provision, the applicant's son is entitled to get compassionate appointment under Section 20 read with Section 47 of Disability Act, 2016. The provisions of Disability Act, 2016 and aims thereto are prepared with a view to safeguard the rights and interests of disabled persons, which is clear from the aims and objects of the Disability Act, 2016 itself, which reads as under:

"OBJECT

The object of the Scheme is to grant appointment on compassionate grounds to dependent family member of a Government servant dying in harness or who is retired on medical grounds, thereby leaving his family in penury and without any means of livelihood, to relieve the family of the Government servant concerned from financial destitution and to help it get over the emergency.

TO WHOM APPI

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top